HOME | DD
prosaix β dep0rnification
Published: 2012-01-23 17:51:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 10973; Favourites: 662; Downloads: 40
Redirect to original
Description
A satire of the retarded skyqeen's insipid 'stamps' that she's been shitting lately.
If you don't know what 'stamps' I'm referring to, look at one of the popular pages, say last 3 days. There's bound to be one there.
Anyway don't forget to fave this durrrr because it's totes awesome and this deserves 10000+
No egos were harmed during the making of this stamp. Also, please, no harassment! DO NOT STEAL MY STAMP!
MORE:
Related content
Comments: 625
Porn isn't art. Nudistic Art is Art. And there's the mature filter... so?
π: 0 β©: 0
I agree. There are 11-year-olds here who use DA and have memberships. Do they really need to see the porn that some sickos have posted here? No. I myself haven't run into much because I keep the filters on, but I have seen some pictures on here that really did need the mature tag-a naked lady (although she was facing backwards so you couldn't see the nasty parts), a really squicky yaoi picture, and not to mention all the BE pictures. For some reason, they decided to leave these out in the open, where even the youngest members could see.
I also think that it has overtaken society so much that even teens are getting into it. (Not even adults should look at it.) Last year, one of my classmates in my computer class got busted for downloading and looking at Internet porn. He was suspended, but when he came back, he actually tried to do it again.
Besides, why do people even make porn anyway? It's definitely an invention man did not need. There is nothing normal about looking at porn, and it is called the drug of the 21st century for a reason.
Although there has always been porn in some form, it is the most prevalent today and much easier to find than it ever has been. Just twenty years ago, it was really hard to find it. Nowadays, porn is all around us, unfortunately. The reason it is called a drug is because it affects your body just the same as drugs. Although you obviously don't ingest or inhale it, porn can cause addictions and cause someone to think about, um, the birds and the bees all the time. People can even become overtaken by porn.
Porn also devalues women, as it makes them look like they have no purpose in life other than to be objects of sexual desire.
Contrary to what some YouTubers say, the Internet is not and never was designed solely for porn. When it first began as the ARPANET, it was used for developing technology for the war. It was introduced to the general public as the Internet (or Super Highway) in the '90's, as a way for people to learn more about our world, communicate, and do research. The Internet was designed so people could communicate with each other and learn about our world, not drool over nudity.
I agree with your stamp and think that more people need to realize that we need to get rid of the porn on here. And it's not just DA, I mean, we need to get rid of porn everywhere.
π: 0 β©: 1
11 Year olds shouldn't have accounts. Report them and they'll be banned.
π: 0 β©: 1
11 Year olds shouldn't have accounts. Report them and they'll be banned.
π: 0 β©: 1
I meant to say went on here, regardless if they had accounts or not.
π: 0 β©: 1
You have to have an account to view the 'porn'.
π: 0 β©: 0
i didn't see porn here(because mature filter) dicks and vaginas isn't art
π: 0 β©: 0
GOD!!!! PEOPLE ARE SO FUCKING IGNORANT AND STUPID!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Personally I think too many people are getting worked up over this issue for a website that specializes in amateur artwork. If you don't like an image don't look at it. This site really doesn't have porn on it. Not as commonly defined anyway. While it may have a lot of nudes, both those well executed ones and a lot more less so. And then there is the definition of Art. What is it? And more importantly who gets to make those rules? How about Chick-fil-a? They got really high standards.
So before we go about banning all the βpornβ can we at least define it. I mean all that Sailor Moon Japanese School girl uniform stuff and Anime stuff. It all promotes pedophiles. Oh and all the girl-on-girl and guy-on-guy kissing and hugging images even the one without any nudity, better dispose of those too, they promotes deviant lifestyles. Oh and don't forget that chick that paints giant flowers that kinda suggest vaginas. Those have got to go too, might give someone an erotic thought. I'm sure the Southern Baptist have a definition that would ban most of art on this site, especially when paired up with an Islamic definition. While we at it lets burn all the objectionable books too!
And for those that believe that photography isn't art. Well I guess Ansel Adams and all those other were just over rate. An that statue of David by that TMNT guy, Donatello, that is definitely porn there. And, and, and...rant exhausted.
As the the kids on the site argument. If the kids are on the internet they can get here as easily as red tube or xxx-r-us. It is the parents responsibility to monitor their children.
π: 0 β©: 0
Personally I think too many people are getting worked up over this issue for a website that specializes in amateur artwork. If you don't like an image don't look at it. This site really doesn't have porn on it. Not as commonly defined anyway. While it may have a lot of nudes, both those well executed ones and a lot more less so. And then there is the definition of Art. What is it? And more importantly who gets to make those rules? How about Chick-fil-a? They got really high standards.
So before we go about banning all the βpornβ can we at least define it. I mean all that Sailor Moon Japanese School girl uniform stuff and Anime stuff. It all promotes pedophiles. Oh and all the girl-on-girl and guy-on-guy kissing and hugging images even the one without any nudity, better dispose of those too, they promotes deviant lifestyles. Oh and don't forget that chick that paints giant flowers that kinda suggest vaginas. Those have got to go too, might give someone an erotic thought. I'm sure the Southern Baptist have a definition that would ban most of art on this site, especially when paired up with an Islamic definition. While we at it lets burn all the objectionable books too!
And for those that believe that photography isn't art. Well I guess Ansel Adams and all those other were just over rate. An that statue of David by that TMNT guy, Donatello, that is definitely porn there. And, and, and...rant exhausted.
As the the kids on the site argument. If the kids are on the internet they can get here as easily as red tube or xxx-r-us. It is the parents responsibility to monitor their children.
π: 0 β©: 0
can you also make a stamp with " Even when they can hold a pencil, lil' brats don't belong here. " ?
π: 0 β©: 1
not all children are bad though i'm 12 and i didn't bother anyone and didn't see anything bad...
π: 0 β©: 0
lol, i was just entertained by reading all these comments and reading most bicker over this! All i say is agree to disagree
π: 0 β©: 0
There is a HUGE difference between the two. I'm on team, "I can't wait for everyone to learn the difference so I can stop flagging so many things as inappropriate even when they don't have mature content filters D:<"
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh thank god, I'm not the only one thinking about this.
π: 0 β©: 0
@JellyFaceJade
Then wouldn't anything be consider porn,because people literally get off to anything nowadays,just saying.
LOL,what a pussy, you know i'm right and your wrong.
And don't you mean whore "life"?
π: 0 β©: 1
This isn't facebook, use the reply button to reply to others.
π: 0 β©: 1
eh,she blocked me
Just wanted her to see the comment.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh ok. Well I doubt she'll see it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah same,but oh well.
π: 0 β©: 1
She deactivated her account but wow, so close minded 
π: 0 β©: 1
same
she would be count as a Misogynist.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thank you, I hate going on and the front page has these terrible Facebook-style fail sexy pictures. I swear next one I see I'll take a hammer and smash that person into 1875.
π: 0 β©: 0
i agree i mean this website is for art not for that i mean if you wanna look at that stuff go to a different site i mean seriously kids use DA!!!
π: 0 β©: 2
Who cares about stupid kids?
π: 0 β©: 0
Well, dA is met for teens, so kids DON'T use dA xD
π: 0 β©: 1
I agree with this. I can see the artistic value of it, I really can, but they have other sites for that. I mean, kids use this site.
π: 0 β©: 1
And? Doesn't mean they should see it here just because they see it there.
π: 0 β©: 1
This is an art website.
For art.
You are all retarded to call drawn dicks and cunts to be not art, and photograth of things that were not created by anyone to be art.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thank You!
Now maybe if the people taking pictures of their schlongs could understand this we might make some progress.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd be so bold as to wonder, is porn REALLY art? Is anime REALLY about a storyline, or quick fanservice and eechi? I think people really want to get off on 'artistic nudes' under the pretense that 'I enjoy it because it's art'. I mean, COME ON YO!
Great stamp, btw. ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
I know, smutty $41T like Ecchi, het, yuri and yaoi.
π: 0 β©: 0
I personally think dA should have a seperate porn section. Some porn is actually artistic and it'd be nice to see dA having, like, a seperate filter to mark porn.
Just a thought.
π: 0 β©: 1
I totally agree with you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Of course, not for cheap grotesque porn. But there's plenty of art that just falls into what deviantART categorizes as porn that I think deserves a place on the site just as much as any other art does.
π: 0 β©: 1
True, but I also find it annoying when people can't see a photo of a nude man or woman without thinking its something sexual or pornographic.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, there is only one such thing as an "artistic" nude. It is painted. If you just photographed a girl (i assume) naked, it isn't art. You didn't make it.
π: 0 β©: 2
So... a picture of a flower isn't art because you didn't make the flower?
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>