HOME | DD

ruby-sting In reply to MapleC [2009-12-17 01:43:09 +0000 UTC]

yeah... that's a little morbid for my taste, but to each her own. thanks btw!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MapleC In reply to ruby-sting [2009-12-17 01:59:21 +0000 UTC]

His*
Just wanted to correct you on that. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ruby-sting In reply to MapleC [2009-12-17 04:33:07 +0000 UTC]

but i'm a her. i have a problem with the dominant male paradigm. i say her because i can.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MapleC In reply to ruby-sting [2009-12-19 01:09:11 +0000 UTC]

Okay, fine. You be wrong if you want to, no skin off my back.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ruby-sting In reply to MapleC [2009-12-19 23:59:59 +0000 UTC]

if people can refer to a woman when they say "to each his own" then i don't see why i can't say "to each her own" when referring to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MapleC In reply to ruby-sting [2009-12-20 01:10:48 +0000 UTC]

Because the human race is considered "mankind," not "womankind."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ruby-sting In reply to MapleC [2009-12-20 14:18:56 +0000 UTC]

yeah... and that's the root of a lot on inequities inherent in our society. perhaps more people should attempt to use feminine or gender neutral terms for a period of time. it's an interesting eye opener.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MapleC In reply to ruby-sting [2009-12-22 02:07:07 +0000 UTC]

I think the problem is quite the opposite, but I'd rather not argue about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0