HOME | DD

Published: 2008-05-16 21:48:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 147; Favourites: 2; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
Been doing a lot of Kamandi reading lately and gleaning some style from Jack 'the King' Kirby.I've also been thinking a lot about the idea that perhaps why Kirby is so renowned is because he created a new language of superhero comics. If you envision the characters as 'characters' in the sense of a symbol (ala a Chinese character), things become fun. For, rather than a symbol representing a sound, i.e. a letter, comic book characters represent complex ideologies, relaying ample information to you at the same speed as say, these words you are reading.
Kirby, knowingly or unknowingly, transformed the medium of comics with his choice of placement, line thickness, shadows, expressions, etc. and a large percentage of superhero artists (whom as of late have actually been incorporating other languages, such as Tezuka's ) continue to 'speak' it.
My aspiration, then, is to eventually help create a new language...
so yeah, normal thoughts.
Related content
Comments: 11
NuclearConvoy [2008-05-17 04:10:21 +0000 UTC]
Well, Chinese characters are ideograms, not sonograms. they represent ideas, notions, concepts and "things", not sounds.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rvxen In reply to NuclearConvoy [2008-05-17 04:40:38 +0000 UTC]
are not sounds but aural ideas?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlfredAskew In reply to NuclearConvoy [2008-05-17 09:40:22 +0000 UTC]
'Olive' is a thing, but I can say 'olive' out loud and it becomes sound. Yes?
Did I catch that right xen?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NuclearConvoy In reply to AlfredAskew [2008-05-17 16:09:26 +0000 UTC]
Chinese characters represent distinct ideas and concepts as written. No need to speak them. Plus, each chinese character can be pronounced a multitude of ways based on various regional dialects and whether or not it is the Japanese pronunciation or not.
Olive is a series or letters, symbols representing sounds, that in combination represent an idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rvxen In reply to NuclearConvoy [2008-05-18 03:03:46 +0000 UTC]
but by viewing the characters it induces a memory which is a recorded experience which, for my processing programs at least, contains not only a visual representation but an aural one as well. it needn't be someone else's pronunciation, for i can't verify for them.
and for 'olive', my brain doesn't register it as five letters, but one word, so i get the idea and the sound at the same time.
i see Kamandi, the character, and i experience 'his' presence.
and then we could debate about whether or not 'things' actually exist.
and then our noses will start bleeding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
NuclearConvoy In reply to rvxen [2008-05-19 04:47:44 +0000 UTC]
No, not really. It'd be like a rocking horse. It'd give us something to do, but get us nowhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AlfredAskew In reply to rvxen [2008-05-18 09:28:08 +0000 UTC]
They're actually researching that one... in Germany I think. I read an article on it, they're trying to prove that things exist when we're not experiencing them. With mirrors and pretty lights. Unfortunately it was full of physics jargon and I got a non-existent nose-bleed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JudgeFred [2008-05-17 03:30:26 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful! You spoke my heart implicitly! Great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Taclobanon [2008-05-16 23:07:11 +0000 UTC]
nice drawing and insight into the kirby style! i'm in total agreement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0