HOME | DD

scilk β€” Frustrated

#comic #snake #snek
Published: 2018-03-29 13:57:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 599; Favourites: 60; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description just....arghhh
Related content
Comments: 16

Temmious [2018-04-11 10:59:10 +0000 UTC]

deja-vu?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scilk In reply to Temmious [2018-04-11 14:32:26 +0000 UTC]

hahaha could be!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Temmious In reply to scilk [2018-04-11 22:55:52 +0000 UTC]

XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Wanderer619 [2018-03-31 04:57:41 +0000 UTC]

Snek

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EelLeumas [2018-03-30 15:58:12 +0000 UTC]

Looks like a bit of a hissing fit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lazy-a-Ile [2018-03-29 19:17:21 +0000 UTC]

Yeah...yeah I was like that after hearing the most retarded thing from the apparent director for Duke Nukem movie...Β  *sigh*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scilk In reply to Lazy-a-Ile [2018-03-30 08:32:10 +0000 UTC]

oh what did u hear?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lazy-a-Ile In reply to scilk [2018-04-01 05:29:33 +0000 UTC]

He said "How can we make a woman hating main character likable?"Β  =_=;;;

Yes such woman hating attitudes like...going against an alien army alone save women from kidnapping aliens, how dare he, am I right? Paying strippers for their services, oh such hate! Went through a worm hole to a parallel universe to help woman only world to fight aliens, much disrespect!
*sigh*

Duke Nukem is is a super silly bad ass action hero with a brain of a nerd, he is a joke.
I suppose putting ones life on the line for other in a super silly bad ass way is hate nowΒ  =_=

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scilk In reply to Lazy-a-Ile [2018-04-01 12:02:14 +0000 UTC]

well maybe he meant "hating" he meant "objectifying"? I dunno the character.Β 
But its possible to like women as objects, and not actually have any respect for them as humans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lazy-a-Ile In reply to scilk [2018-04-01 12:44:21 +0000 UTC]

Well all the girls in those games are working in a job that pays for showing boobs...ssssoooo yeah, don't really see it. Plus work of fiction, you can't objectify pixels on a screen in my opinion. Eh, I dunno, just annoyed me since the guy sounded like he was saying it more to score some social virtue points.Β  =w=

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scilk In reply to Lazy-a-Ile [2018-04-02 00:00:27 +0000 UTC]

pays for showing boobs = pays for objectifying though XD

And I do tend to believe all forms of art can promote objectification. But that's just my 2 cents.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lazy-a-Ile In reply to scilk [2018-04-02 05:47:05 +0000 UTC]

You can see it like that for sure but that to me sounds like a really narrow view. Besides what does that make the seller? By the end of the day, you are supporting someone's lively hood objectification or not. Sure I'm not that naive to think that objectification doesn't happen but paying someone for a service they willingly provide, in my opinion has nothing to do with objectification. If you go to someone not willing to provide that service, yeah, I see that as objectification. Though even that might be a too narrow way to say it, argh...
I mean this just yells that "Grid Girl" controversy which is another can of wormsΒ  =w=

*Sigh* Sorry if this dragged out a bit, I've heard news like these ones every which way and it's giving me fatigue, so you picture is very good in capturing this feelingΒ  XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kerostar23 [2018-03-29 17:20:54 +0000 UTC]

sounds like a every day thing.
hugs help...sometimes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scilk In reply to kerostar23 [2018-03-30 08:32:02 +0000 UTC]

hugs are good

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lavender-Skunk [2018-03-29 14:03:37 +0000 UTC]

Same snekΒ 
Same

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scilk In reply to Lavender-Skunk [2018-03-30 08:31:53 +0000 UTC]

U_U

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0