HOME | DD

SplinteredMatt β€” UNSC Gladiator-class light cruiser

Published: 2011-10-17 20:44:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 31857; Favourites: 402; Downloads: 345
Redirect to original
Description The Gladiator-class light cruiser was a class of light cruisers utilised by the United Nations Space Command, which served between 2617 and 2678 and saw major action during the Galactic War and later Swarm War. The class was initially conceived during the Human-Covenant War as a replacement for the aging Halcyon-class light cruiser, to fill the capability gap between the UNSC's heavy destroyers and the Marathon-class heavy cruiser. The design was eventually shelved in favour of increased Marathon production, and it was only when UNSC designers revisited the plans in 2611 that work began on the Gladiator-class in earnest. Introduced in 2617, during a time of increasing galactic tension, the class served through the Galactic War just five years into its service. In 2633, immediately after this, vessels of the class participated in the Swarm War, which eventually gripped the galaxy until 2678.

The Gladiator-class was designated a light cruiser as a result of its comparatively thin armour; and armament of one light and one medium MAC, rather than the two medium guns a heavier cruiser would have. Its light armour, combined with its oversized reactors and exhaust thrusters, gave it superb speed for a craft of its size. Despite this, the Gladiator-class was comparable in size to the Marathon- and Halcyon-class cruisers, with an overall length of 1054 metres. Crucially, The Gladiator-class shared the same interior 'honeycombed' design as its predecessors, enabling it to withstand astounding volumes of fire.

The Gladiator-class commonly operated with other UNSC Navy vessels as part of naval formations, for example leading destroyer squadrons or functioning in battle groups. However, they were also well suited to independent operation, patrolling borders and shipping routes and conducting raids on enemy territory. The class's long operational range and relative speed made it capable of operating alone for extended periods of time, and its strong weaponry and armour meant that it was able to overpower most hostile vessels it encountered.

length: 1054m
height: 301.7m
mass: 4.824,564 metric tons
speed:
-vaccuum: 186,780kph
-atmosphere: not rated
engine/powerplant:
-Mark XVI TEMPEST fusion reactor (2)
-Mark VI TRITON fusion reactor (1)
shielding: nine linked Mark X AEGIS Projected Energy Barrier System
armament:
-Mark XIV Medium Magnetic Accelerator Cannon (1)
-Mark III Light Magnetic Accelerator Cannon (1)
-RSGM-16 Archers (80 pods, 2400 missiles)
-RIM-109 Medusas (2000 cells, 2000 missiles)
-BSGM-14 Harpoons (30 tubes, 90 missiles)
-RSM-19 Shiva (1 tube, 10 missiles)
-dual Mark XIII 305mm naval gun turrets (22)
-dual Mark XII 155mm naval gun turrets (32)
-quad M502 50mm railgun turrets (60)
aircraft complement: Navy Embarked Force:
-F/A-352B Longsword squadron (8 craft)
-F-371 Halberd squadron (12 craft)
-F-419C Sabre squadron (12 craft)
-B-221 Scythe (3)
-E-221 Warden or P-221 Ranger (1)
FQ-99B Dart (24)
-RQ-117 Clarion (6)
crew:
-1356 naval personnel (209 officers, 1147 enlisted)
-165 naval flight technicians and flight crew

Drawn in Inkscape. Do not use without permission.

Download for larger image!
Related content
Comments: 33

lordhades13 [2015-01-12 16:50:07 +0000 UTC]

It seems like with a ship of that size, more MAC cannons could be mounted frontally to increase its firepower. Β It seems like once a ship fires the main weapon, it takes a long time to recharge, then putting more of the weapons on a forward mount could be effective.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mickeymouseisgay In reply to lordhades13 [2015-02-12 00:04:28 +0000 UTC]

But that would put more strain on the reactors, slowing the recharge time and possibly preventing the other MACs from firing altogether.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lordhades13 In reply to Mickeymouseisgay [2015-05-01 16:29:12 +0000 UTC]

I feel like a ship that can travel faster than the speed of light would have a lot of power generation leftover to power the additional mac cannons, but in terms of halo lore, I am afraid I don't know much about it. Β 
I did some research and found out that the ships use fusion reactors, which theoretically could produce a lot of power. Β However the halo universes power output of a fusion reactor seems to be defined as enough power to keep a mjolnirΒ armor suit powered for fifteen years. Β If that means with the shields fully activated on the suit, then that could be a lot of power. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mickeymouseisgay In reply to lordhades13 [2015-05-01 22:15:34 +0000 UTC]

Actually I think the halcyon class had a system that collects and recycles energy spent in firing a MAC round.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flamefox777 [2013-06-29 03:08:08 +0000 UTC]

Crap! 5.2M short tons and this is a "light cruiser?" What are battle ships? 15M tons?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mickeymouseisgay In reply to flamefox777 [2015-05-01 22:13:43 +0000 UTC]

It's based on the armor thickness, not the overall weight of the craft

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

flamefox777 In reply to Mickeymouseisgay [2015-05-03 00:30:24 +0000 UTC]

Most naval ships use displacement. Real aircraft carriers are like 100,000 tons. But, fictional spaceships can of course use anything.

Thanks for the two-year-old reply!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Stargazzer811 In reply to flamefox777 [2020-03-26 17:02:59 +0000 UTC]

I've come to consider that spaceships use gravitational displacement, as in space an object does not eliminate gravitational force but displaces it. Therefore using the appropriate conversion formula you could find how many Imperial or Metric tons a ship would be by how much gravity it displaces.

Oh PS. You're welcome for a reply on a 5 year old comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

flamefox777 In reply to Stargazzer811 [2020-03-26 19:09:42 +0000 UTC]

Better late than never!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stargazzer811 In reply to flamefox777 [2020-03-26 20:46:15 +0000 UTC]

Agreed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mickeymouseisgay In reply to flamefox777 [2015-05-04 21:58:30 +0000 UTC]

It said in the description that the gladiator-class is considered a light cruiser do to it's relatively thin armour

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Onyx2589 [2012-12-07 19:40:48 +0000 UTC]

I have found the model for my Venator-class Super Heavy Cruiser.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Onyx2589 [2012-12-11 20:05:41 +0000 UTC]

What do you mean?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Onyx2589 In reply to SplinteredMatt [2012-12-11 21:28:09 +0000 UTC]

i mean i'm going to use this model for a character profile for reference on my fan-fic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Onyx2589 [2013-05-06 17:54:07 +0000 UTC]

Well, this file is copyrighted. Just reminding you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Onyx2589 In reply to SplinteredMatt [2013-05-06 18:00:45 +0000 UTC]

i'm not going to publish whatever i'm writing publicly or anything. I'm not that much of a bastard. I'm actually a considerate person.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Onyx2589 [2013-05-06 18:02:57 +0000 UTC]

Ah, good to know. You wouldn't believe how many people have infringed the copyright on my images.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Onyx2589 In reply to SplinteredMatt [2013-05-07 02:02:19 +0000 UTC]

you're the first person that's believed me about that on here. Don't worry, i won't do anything douchy like that. I actually give a F*ck about people's property. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

noneofurbussiness [2012-10-14 03:02:51 +0000 UTC]

Looks well armed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to noneofurbussiness [2012-10-20 20:22:33 +0000 UTC]

Indeed- perhaps too well armed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

noneofurbussiness In reply to SplinteredMatt [2012-10-21 01:12:28 +0000 UTC]

Bah! No such thing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kenkwasi [2012-08-06 00:35:30 +0000 UTC]

Looks beast for just a light cruiser. Armed to the teeth!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Kenkwasi [2012-08-06 18:44:09 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I may have to change that depending on how my other cruiser classes turn out, when I eventually design them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Furry-Failure [2012-06-19 10:05:52 +0000 UTC]

o.O I did the same thruster design for my ship xD only just found this after I completed my ship

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Furry-Failure In reply to Furry-Failure [2012-06-19 10:38:07 +0000 UTC]

Re-edditing it so there isn't any problems

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Furry-Failure [2012-06-19 12:48:51 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry about it! The engine section of this ship is virtually a direct copy of Bungie's Halcyon-class, so doesn't belong to me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Furry-Failure In reply to SplinteredMatt [2012-06-19 19:52:09 +0000 UTC]

ah ok thnx xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AresXVIII [2012-02-12 17:10:19 +0000 UTC]

good job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to AresXVIII [2012-02-12 17:17:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kwibl [2012-01-27 21:31:24 +0000 UTC]

While it's easy to see where the individual parts are inspired from (Halcyon at the back, Frigate arm at the front) it's pretty well composed and looks far more original than most fanon lineart i see for Halo. Well done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Kwibl [2012-01-27 23:25:34 +0000 UTC]

The back half is more or less an exact copy from the Halcyon as it appeared in Reach, and the front was made to look more like the frigate than canon cruisers, so you're right on both of those. Thanks for the input!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nanosoldier [2011-10-18 11:25:39 +0000 UTC]

Purely brilliant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SplinteredMatt In reply to Nanosoldier [2011-10-18 12:23:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0