HOME | DD
ThatOneKiddo — Wait a second...
Published: 2010-06-19 18:45:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4523; Favourites: 175; Downloads: 25
Redirect to original
Description
Please, enlighten me.I used 's stamp template, and I appreciate that.
Related content
Comments: 352
You think she's better then that? Think again. She's done this so many times it makes my head spin
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ugh 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm going to assume you didn't see the one about animal testing. She compared that one to Nazi's and testing on black people
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
...wat...
Fortunetly for me, I didn't happen to see that debacle, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. Seriously, where do these facts come from, Encyclopedia Dramatica?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If they were from ED they'd at least be funny. Chances are she's ripping them from Peta articles and propaganda posters
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Haha, you know on her baby wolves are left behind because of hunters stamp? I noted her asking her to change the word "Hunter" to "Poacher" to make it true, but she just went on a bitch fit about how hunters do leave baby wolves alive because animals mate and have litters ALL the time ¬¬
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Please just stop, and start DA fresh... Would you really do up to medical students and say examining a cadaver is the same as selling children?
Taxidermy deals with dead animals and a LOT of the time taxidermists survive on road kill, they don't kidnap and sell living things, especially babies....
Please understand that many MANY taxidermists do NOT abuse animals, kill, or even pay to have animals killed. I for one work with only roadkills, meat animals, and occasionally pest controlled animals, like the grey squirrle (Which here in the UK is a huge problem)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, examining a cadaver is more like Nazi testing facilities to her
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lol, yup cept they've replaced living jews with any one that died, but hey vets and doctors don't need to learn first hand how the inards of animals and people work, because thecnology (Which is totes evil because it's man made) is soooooooooo good they can learn all they need from book and the internet before having a living animal/persons life in their hands
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah! I now know the exact texture of a sharks liver from a dissection and I have a general idea of where the shark died from it's stomach contents as well as whether it gave birth, how long it's been dead, and how it died.....But I guess I could have gotten all that information off this one individual shark off the internet
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But of course! Using an already dead on is just plain crule, evil, sadist, and what ever else she calls people like you and me XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't know about you but I'm such terrible person, you,and the people that raised you are terrible if you think I'm a good person [link]
Just to set things strait, I adopted all 6 of my pets, I feed birds in the park, I used to groom horses with blood diseases. I also cleaned beaches and have re-released snakes, frogs,lizards,mice, and rats. But I know why factory farming is necessary and I hunt hares, squirrels, doves and other small game with one of dogs.....So I guess I'm a pretty bad person
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bitch! You're horrible! Even worse than me and I sell children on the black market! (Which by the way I'm currently looking to unload a mass of my stock before they pass their sell by date if you get what I mean 
I have to say though, most people do look at my gallery and instantly think animal abuser and fur farms, but a vast majority of my skins are roadkill, followed by pest control, then meat animals, and lastly pet food. I've never and would never buy anything from a fur farm like for some reason (Because we all know fur farms skin out their animals for taxidermy) she thinks all taxidermists do ¬¬
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I started hunting as a religious practice, for shamanism. Through meditation I found out my spirit animal was a hare, so to make totems and medicine I needed to hunt down a hare. I kept it up though because it was legal, because my dog liked it, and because it was a good outlet for left over energy from my ADHD. Plus every time I killed a wild animal it was one animal I knew didn't suffer to be on my plate (And after a certain episode of Criminal minds one animal I knew that wasn't actually a human)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You compare selling children to taxidermy?
Wow. You're stupider than I thought.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic creation and the distribution of innocent children are not the same. You're obviously off your rocker.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Both victims. Both abused and killed in the name of money. Both chanceless. It narrows down to that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
...Erm?
Except the animals usually aren't raped?
I give up.
This is sick.
-.-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not about being raped. That's not the point -_-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Exactly.
The points you are making have absolutely nothing to do with one another. Animals are not nearly as defenseless as small children. One of these things is vastly worse than the other.
So you're an animal lover. All right. That's fine.
But get educated, and get realistic, because the food chain's not going away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Most of the time today, taxidermy is made from already-dead animals or road-kill or just carcases that are well preserved. They were already dead
Selling children is the worst manner, because you're putting a poor innocent child who is alive through pain.
How are they the same level? -_-'
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
(KidateCalf I need your help because I'm sick of her bullshit and I want to make sure she sees this shit)
Well then Romaniya allow me to compare you to a child snatcher for eating beans and nuts. Even though a child could see the similarities
1) Beans and nuts are premature forms of plats and are taken from their parents before they reach maturity for the sole purpose of dying (Even hunters wont do that)
2) In both cases the children are abused, Children are usually kept in confined spaces where no one else can take them, while beans and nuts are kept in bags to make sure they never get "Misplaced"
3) Both are still alive through their torture and there's evidence that plants can in fact feel pain
4)In both cases torture is cruel and unusual. Kidnappers tend to rape their hostages, beat them, or in Albert Fish's case eat them (Kind of ironic since he's one of the worst serial killers to ever live) beans are boiled alive, or crushed into paste, nuts are sometimes ground into fine powder or just eaten alive
5) Both of them compromise the safety zone of whoever they're torturing, I.E. keeping a kid from going home or taking them from their room, or taking a bean from it's pod or a nut from it's shell.
Those are similarities that can't be denied. And you make me sick.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm still waiting for her propaganda novel to be finished and fail afterwards. Just imagine her using children as metaphors/similies to describe a stuffed moose on a wall.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
taxidermy is made from already-dead animals or road-kill or just carcases that are well preserved. They were already dead
Thanks for your reply. I have nothing against using corpses of animals that were already dead. But I think you mean that in SOME cases taxidermy is made from already-dead animals. Because most are made from hunted animals to "show what they have caught".
Selling children is the worst manner, because you're putting a poor innocent child who is alive through pain. How are they the same level? -_-'
Animals are alive, too.
The similarities (though even a child can see them);
1. Animals and children are both living creatures with feelings and emotions. They both can have a trauma, feel pain and suffer.
2. In both cases (the selling children and fur-farming) people take advantage of them. And in both cases their bodies are sold. In both cases they suffer long or a lifetime.
3. In both cases the abusers don't care about their feelings, ignore their screaming, ignore their health and ignore the fact that they want to live. Their pain leaves the abusers cold.
4. In both cases the cruelty is done in the name of money.
Those are the similarities, which can't be denied. They're both sick.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The smiliarities between you and a hamster are as such (though even those sold children can see them) :
1. You both have a brain the size of a grape.
2. You have no capability for logical reasoning.
3. You run mindlessly on a wheel (metaphorically, in your case... I hope...) for hours on end.
The difference? The hamster has common sense. Not to mention survival instinct, which you seem to be seriously lacking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
... says an amateur to someone who studies the subject.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I believe I addressed this in my reply to your other comment, Madame Expert. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
How can you compare kids to animals?
I've seen animals have it better then children.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Although, humans are a species of animal, no matter how intelligent, but I see your point, kind of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
She can compare testing on black people to testing on animals. She does this all the time
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Okay, now that I can understand comparing to (without the racist part.)
But comparing selling children to an art of putting together an already dead organism kinda confuses me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's because she uses Peta tactics. She compares something shocking to something almost completely unrelated. Kind of like comparing chickens in farms to jews in concentration camps
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah, I see now. Thanks for clearing that up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Then open your eyes and take a look inside some fur farms.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have. I rather be one of those animals being made into fur then being a child used for sex, abused by the man, not being free, and locked being a sexual slave.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'd also prefer to be killed by a terrorist than by a sadist. But that doesn't mean the terrorist is an angel all of a sudden. They're both still evil as hell.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What does this have to do what we were talking about?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You seem to be very ignorant about fur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you talk to yourelf, then don't send that message to me, please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That doesn't make sense.
I'm only saying I have seen you commenting on many fur and animal testing stamps here. You seem to start fights alot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't start fights, these are called: DISCUSSIONS. Do you have a problem with that? Maybe you see it as "fights" because the truth about fur-farms is revealed, but it are still discussions. I defend victims of cruelty. I stand up for them, just like how people stand up for child abuse. Children, gays and animals are still abused by many people in the world. If I'm not allowed to share my information or opinion, then I might as well say the same about you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I respect your opinion but you have to respect our opinion that we can't compare a animal to a human being. We simply see humans more important then animals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Humans are a species of animal, no matter how intellegent they are. I honestly believe humans are quite cocky about themselves, which is one of the reasons you said as you did.
The proper saying would be "other animals," because if you're not an animal, you're either a tiny organism that you have to look at under a microscope, or a plant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not to interlude here, but what the person means by saying animals is non-human animals. Most of the time the 'non-' part of the word is dropped because it is cumbersome.
This, however, does not diminish from said person's point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
A cruel girl in my class once said the same about dark skinned people. She thought that white people were more important and higher and that treating dark people like shit was ok. But that doesn't change the fact that it's just abuse. But yeah... it's your choice. I just feel sorry for your victims.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What do you mean "Your victims"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>