HOME | DD

tjparson β€” Shaded Fields by-nc-nd

Published: 2008-06-29 05:28:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 417; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I went to my grandmother's house to say 'good bye' to some relative leaving for England. This is some of the beauty I see driving home on US-74 (such a pretty stretch of road). I really don't have much else to say aside from the standard and I LOVE PANORAMAS!

Thank you very much for looking.
Please share your thoughts and/or critique; it will be greatly appreciated.
Related content
Comments: 36

MechaBuu [2008-07-02 02:38:22 +0000 UTC]

That's a big shadow. Was there a UFO at your area?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to MechaBuu [2008-07-03 18:32:44 +0000 UTC]

the fields were covered in these splotchy shadows
lol nope just some crazy cloudness

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rendolen [2008-06-29 23:33:02 +0000 UTC]

hooray for farmland! I really like the shadows

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Rendolen [2008-06-30 06:56:21 +0000 UTC]

woot! woot! thank you and yay (because that's exactly where i wanted the main focus to go)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CGJake [2008-06-29 22:02:00 +0000 UTC]

It's really pretty, and it really looks like something you would see in an art gallery or something.


Just wondering, did you stitch this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to CGJake [2008-06-30 06:55:24 +0000 UTC]

thank you
wow really!? you think so?! …thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CGJake In reply to tjparson [2008-06-30 22:08:28 +0000 UTC]

Yup. There's a certain... serenity about it. The buildings in the background bother me, but I just personally don't like buildings in nature. It's not your fault, I'm just obsessive compulsive.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to CGJake [2008-07-01 17:30:54 +0000 UTC]

i'm going to copy and paste a conversation i had with someone on this shot-

=Sakonworshiper
—–-It's sheer beauty and awe are all ruined by the grain silloh in the background :C


I would crop that out, but it's still good

*tjparson
—–-no! the silo was left in the shot for balance…lemme esplain
a) i wanted to place emphasis on the contrast between the golden field and the blue sky, thus i made this a horizontal panorama
b) due to the tree line being so dark, the shadows of the clouds on the field became dull, so i needed something to break up the tree line
c) the white silo added just the right amount of contrast against the trees to draw your attention just to the right of the center of the shot and near the back of the field next to the trees. bringing the focus there allowed me to place a little extra emphasis on the shadows cast by the clouds

put it in large view and crop it out with your hand…the shot becomes fairly bland (it doesn't make your eyes jump around)
(this doesn't work as well when it is in the small view though)

=Sakonworshiper
—–-must you have a logical explination for everything?


---------------
thats what happens to my pictures when i work with my OCDs ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CGJake In reply to tjparson [2008-07-02 01:18:28 +0000 UTC]

Heh. You're right!

I've always had a problem with humanity showing up in nature shots, but it really WOULD look incomplete without it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to CGJake [2008-07-03 18:34:16 +0000 UTC]

well there are times where it shouldn't be there, but for a field made by people, it just wouldn't look right without it ya know?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

drawingthegirl [2008-06-29 20:04:22 +0000 UTC]

One of my favourites by you so far! If I had the monies I'd buy a print.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to drawingthegirl [2008-06-30 06:54:46 +0000 UTC]

thanks jaime!!! that means so much to me coming from you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

drawingthegirl In reply to tjparson [2008-07-01 08:41:17 +0000 UTC]

Aww shucks.

Hah. You're doing really well kiddo, it's cool to see your progress and how you are growing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to drawingthegirl [2008-07-01 17:20:03 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sakonworshiper [2008-06-29 15:08:27 +0000 UTC]

It's sheer beauty and awe are all ruined by the grain silloh in the background :C


I would crop that out, but it's still good

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Sakonworshiper [2008-06-30 06:54:20 +0000 UTC]

no! the silo was left in the shot for balance…lemme esplain
a) i wanted to place emphasis on the contrast between the golden field and the blue sky, thus i made this a horizontal panorama
b) due to the tree line being so dark, the shadows of the clouds on the field became dull, so i needed something to break up the tree line
c) the white silo added just the right amount of contrast against the trees to draw your attention just to the right of the center of the shot and near the back of the field next to the trees. bringing the focus there allowed me to place a little extra emphasis on the shadows cast by the clouds

put it in large view and crop it out with your hand…the shot becomes fairly bland (it doesn't make your eyes jump around)
(this doesn't work as well when it is in the small view though)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sakonworshiper In reply to tjparson [2008-07-01 03:54:03 +0000 UTC]

must you have a logical explination for everything?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Sakonworshiper [2008-07-01 04:46:41 +0000 UTC]

lol i try to…is that a problem?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sakonworshiper In reply to tjparson [2008-07-01 18:44:01 +0000 UTC]

no, not at all

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Sakonworshiper [2008-07-01 18:52:00 +0000 UTC]

ha thats good to know

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sakonworshiper In reply to tjparson [2008-07-01 18:52:42 +0000 UTC]

I know right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

atBobbert [2008-06-29 12:34:21 +0000 UTC]

Cool. And I'll bet the contrast of the shadows was better--more striking--in person than is represented in the photo. I love these kind of shots but I can never seem to capture the contrast as I see it.

Taylor, what app do you use for stitching?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to atBobbert [2008-06-30 06:46:14 +0000 UTC]

the shadows were incredible. i tried to lower the light levels in an attempt to make the shadows much more distinguished, but twas futile because it turned the trees black and there was no happy medium!
no picture can ever capture the intensity of the the sheer beauty of what the eye can see (but thats why photoshop was created)

i use a program that came with my camera (canon powershot sd1000), but it is a less than stellar program. i will be getting a crazy setup within the next six months (hopefully) and when i do, i will def let you know

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

atBobbert In reply to tjparson [2008-07-02 10:43:52 +0000 UTC]

I know what you mean--the eye's dynamic range far exceeds our CCD/CMOSs--even film

Cool, I'd like to know what you settle on..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to atBobbert [2008-07-03 18:27:48 +0000 UTC]

its sad…
i may be getting a whole new setup soon so i will def let you know

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

atBobbert In reply to tjparson [2008-07-04 03:55:49 +0000 UTC]

Cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Spirit31 [2008-06-29 10:57:28 +0000 UTC]

Bravo!

really cool shot.. i especially loved the lines on the ground..

and the shapes of the clouds.. ^^

and as usual.. ehm!.. loved that still lifeobject that you include in your shots.. ((the water tanks))

i dunno if it was in purpose or not ^^" but it makes the shot 'erfect' as i see it..

regards

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Spirit31 [2008-06-30 06:32:26 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much
the clouds that day were full of character
ah, so you're a fan of my 'human element' that i try to include in my shots?
thank you very much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Spirit31 In reply to tjparson [2008-06-30 14:55:19 +0000 UTC]

lol.. I can't really say i'm a "Human Element fan"!

but in my point of view, i think it gives the picture something..mmm..

i don't really know how to descibe it.. a 'detail' maybe <
and of course that "human element" isn't suitable for all kind of shots!..

i dunno if u got me in this point.. =?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Spirit31 [2008-07-01 17:39:33 +0000 UTC]

right…i feel like the minor 'human elements' have a certain appeal to them when used tastefully in a shot such as this…but they have to 'fit' the shot…example-if i were to do a shot of a sunset-sunsets are big so i would want to place something small (or appears small in the size of the shot) in the shot (plane maybe)-sunsets tend to be up…so i would put something that one would normally see when looking up (plane, street lamp, ect)
yes you are right the 'human element isn't suitable for all shots.
…lol sry, didn't mean to write so much ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GraphicFoundry [2008-06-29 09:38:48 +0000 UTC]

I've got a thing for panoramas myself and this is a nice one . The colour of the ploughed field is quite thin compared to the trees. It makes an interesting contrast. I wonder how it would look in a sunset or sunrise. The shape of the field looks like somebody's back, their shoulders at the right-hand side of the image. Cool, dude .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to GraphicFoundry [2008-06-30 06:29:49 +0000 UTC]

lol secretly we all do
yeah i really liked the contrast, so i made a horizontal pano (as well as trying to emphasis the shadows of the clouds)
holy crapola it does!
thanks much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Heidipickels [2008-06-29 05:45:32 +0000 UTC]

Hi Taylor, Lovely pic as usual. Don't you just love farm land. It's different everytime you pass it, like a living picture. You captured this one very well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to Heidipickels [2008-06-29 19:39:53 +0000 UTC]

hello. thank you i really do like farmland
thank you very much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XxNeversoftxX [2008-06-29 05:37:53 +0000 UTC]

hey whats up just saying hello cuz im back for a while and comment your photo:
oh wow what a bautiful photo i like the the view
the terrenal gives the photo an awesome view , i like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tjparson In reply to XxNeversoftxX [2008-06-29 19:38:47 +0000 UTC]

yay! you're back
thank you very much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0