HOME | DD

tractern In reply to aerendial [2013-02-22 17:48:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man, it's a v old one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aerendial In reply to tractern [2013-02-22 18:54:55 +0000 UTC]

yeah, it's old but it's presence still. I'm so happy to 'hear' you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tractern In reply to robert-kim-karen [2010-05-24 20:33:46 +0000 UTC]

True about the jittery quality but it was at 1/3s and I had no tripod.

Glad you like it though mate, your feedback helps me improve!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

robert-kim-karen In reply to tractern [2010-06-01 19:15:21 +0000 UTC]

AMazing for 1/3s.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tractern In reply to robert-kim-karen [2010-06-01 19:16:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you mate.

It is nice to talk to people who understand these things.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tractern In reply to aobaob [2010-02-21 12:35:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tractern In reply to adamlack [2010-02-15 13:38:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, yeah I do like to call the noise and camera shake in my shot devices that I use for 'artistic purposes' rather than rubbish camera skills...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

adamlack In reply to tractern [2010-02-15 14:10:45 +0000 UTC]

haha, I'm just the same. Everything that comes out of the camera is 'intentional'.

"Artistic" is a wonderful word.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tractern In reply to adamlack [2010-02-15 14:23:04 +0000 UTC]

hehe, yeah I agree with that.

Nah, I in reality I am quite militant about instinct over intention. The more intention, the more technical ability, the less creativity and imagination and spontaneity within a piece. With photography, anyways...

Mm, artistic is a nice word indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tractern In reply to steve2727 [2010-02-14 21:42:48 +0000 UTC]

hehe.

You have a good Val Day, bud?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

steve2727 In reply to tractern [2010-02-14 21:45:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0