HOME | DD

tranimation-art — DeviantID IV

Published: 2010-05-09 03:00:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 5194; Favourites: 66; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description "I'm your boyfriend now, Nancy..."

I support the Platinum Dunes' Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) reboot, and let me tell you why: The original film, the first Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), is near perfect — that is, until the last five minutes! The production ran out of money and creator-writer-director Wes Craven couldn't film the original climax in the script, so he had to slap something together and we got the infamous car scene. This ending made no sense in the context of the story and came completely out of left-field — it was a Big-Lipped Alligator Moment — where it just ends abruptly, with little to no explanation, leaving the audience scratching their head in complete confusion! Nevertheless, every kid remembers being scared to death by Freddy Krueger after watching it! I find that people have forgotten that the first film was actually a serious, cerebral "mind fuck" of a horror film that straddled between psychological terror and splatter/slasher, which made it fresh and new — and Freddy was originally a serious monster that was, in fact, a child molester and serial murderer. Subsequently, five sequels went by, one by one, over the span of a decade, which spiraled down in quality each time, focusing more on cheesy comedy and moving further and further away from the scariness and intelligence of the original. It turned Freddy into an icon, but with great sacrifice: The character had evolved into a "clown" and the films just became a joke! Little kids started running around with Freddy gloves (which is really messed up when you think about it)! And this is when Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994) came in...

Just when I thought the franchise had ran its course and Freddy could do no more, the seventh film New Nightmare blew me away! Wes Craven returned to the series after years of avoidance, with a bigger budget and more freedom, and he went out to "remake" the original 1984 film the way it was meant to be, but still transform it into something new and completely original. The film takes the phrase "art imitating life" to a whole new meaning; it ran like a reality show (before they became popular) and a behind-the-scenes documentary in one, where the cast of the first film (now ten years older), including its crew and executives, are playing themselves in a pseudoistic real-life setting! New Nightmare brought the character of Freddy Krueger back to what Wes Craven originally intended him to be, back to his original child molester-murderer roots — the personification of evil! He was darker, sicker, scarier, more menacing than ever before, and I was happy beyond all belief! Freddy Krueger has finally earned back his claws! And it brought back the original ending of the first film, with action and emotions and closure! New Nightmare was a praised by critics, but was box office failure. Audiences just didn't like it, which was a damn shame; and, I feel, there were two main reasons behind this: (1) The Nightmare franchise is a series primarily remembered by its sequels. We were introduced to Freddy during the original film, primarily as kids who shouldn’t have been watching it in the first place and, for a solid decade, we watched the sequels, primarily as teenagers! Audiences were used to and were expecting "Freddy the Clown." This was "recon" before it existed! Nobody fuckin' expected that! They didn’t want to be scared; they wanted to laugh! There's a hypocrisy to this that just blows my mind! (2) Up to this point, nobody had ever seen a film like this! Nothing like this had never been done! It was too original, too self-aware, too ahead of its time. It didn't just push down the fourth wall, it shattered it — it was too real too soon! And a few years later, what happens? Wes Craven moved to Dimension Films and churned out Scream (1996), which was a blender re-packaging of New Nightmare, and it became an international blockbuster — what bullshit! And you know what's worse? The next film was Freddy vs. Jason, which brought back the "clown" and I was pissed beyond belief!

Now, don't get me wrong, I love Robert Englund and I always will. Jackie Earle Haley isn't Robert Englund, he will never be Robert Englund, and he's not even trying to be: Jackie is going to be Jackie! Freddy hasn't never truly been done the way he was suppose to be, and the film itself has never truly been done the way it was suppose to be! But if there's a franchise that needs to be rebooted/re-conned/remade/revitalized, it's Nightmare on Elm Street! And we're getting the 2010 Platinum Dunes remake, with Jackie Earle Haley as Freddy — and whether or not the film does well, we, at least, got Freddy back to his roots! No more jokes! No more clowns! He's a serial killer again! He's a child molester again! He's a rapist again! He's not a character you're suppose to like! He is the ultimate monster! He is the ultimate badass! The remake should not be compared to the original films. It's a different film entirely and should be judged as a completely different animal...

I saw the film opening weekend and I loved the film! I've seen it six times to date. This remake was just classy! When was the last time you saw a classy horror, let alone a classy film in general? Next to Wes Craven's New Nightmare, the 2010 remake is the perfect Nightmare film. The story flows great, the acting is wonderful, the cinematography is gorgeous, the editing is nice, the dialogue is quite good. There's no sex, no nudity, the blood and gore is minimal, and the swearing is tasteful. They took subject matter that was vile, child abuse and molestation, and executed it with sophistication. It even have animal cruelty; animals never die in films and children are rarely ever in danger in films! Jackie Earle Haley's Freddy Krueger was chilling and orgasmic! I didn't know whether to be creeped out by him or turned on by him... The practical effects were excellent. The CGI was, unfortunately, unspectacular and were the only true flaw of the film, but I'm a animator, so I'm trained to see those things. Nonetheless, they were effective and that's what counts in the end. (Hollywood forgets that CGI should assist the film, not be bogged down by it.) The film, also, didn't hold back:  It took risks and it was smart and classy! I loved that they used "what you see in your mind is far worse than what you see on screen" tactic and far more terrifying. There was nothing superfluous about the film. Definitely one of the best films (particularly for a remake) I've seen in a long, long time! If you haven't seen it, watch it! I recommend the film to horror and non-horror fans alike!

Behold my new DeviantID! I took a photo of myself in front of the poster of the Nightmare on Elm Street remake at my local cinema, replacing myself with Nancy, as I screamed my head off in either terror or excitement... (Maybe this is due to the fact that I'm looking up at his crotch. )

Promotions of the Film:

          - Trailer #1
          - Trailer #2
          - Trailer #3
          - Behind-the-scenes featurette
          - An "adorkable" interview with Jackie Earle Haley
          - A fantastic visit to the film set

Clips from the Film (which excited me to no end!):

          - Clip #1
          - Clip #2 (Gorgeous!)
          - Clip #3 (Eee!)
          - Clip #4

Medium - Photoshop.

A Nightmare on Elm Street © Wes Craven/Platinum Dunes/New Line Cinema.
Related content
Comments: 364

tranimation-art In reply to ??? [2010-05-21 20:50:21 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you. I still love the original 1984 film, but I like the remake just a little more. It took away all the superfluous stuff and took it into a darker place. The remake is just a superiour film -- very classy film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ataya970 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-21 20:54:07 +0000 UTC]

exactly how i feel. did you see the JEH MEME I just did?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Ataya970 [2010-05-21 21:07:22 +0000 UTC]

(runs and checks) Eeeeeeeeeeee! Love it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bubonicc In reply to ??? [2010-05-21 19:08:57 +0000 UTC]

This hads made my day so much brighter. <3 I loved that part. Now I sneek up on my friend and say "Im you're boyfriend now Jamie" and do his awesone creepy laugh. LOL <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Bubonicc [2010-05-21 19:58:32 +0000 UTC]

LOL! I'm glad I could make you day brighter. I'd love to hear your Freddy chuckle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bubonicc In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-21 20:00:23 +0000 UTC]

XDD Its great XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stephenc123 In reply to ??? [2010-05-18 11:12:59 +0000 UTC]

I'm scared and confused But it looks great! Love the explanation and history lesson! I love your expression and the flames! Oh and ummm...Please seek immediate medical attention...about the you know...ovary explosion...ICK! That can't be good for your health! TTwTT

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to stephenc123 [2010-05-18 23:38:38 +0000 UTC]

You should come with me and watch the remake. It's a good film.

As for Freddy's sexiness, I completely blame the actor. He chose to portray him that way. It was chilling and sexy. It was quite confusing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stephenc123 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-19 03:29:44 +0000 UTC]

Hooray! I'd love too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to stephenc123 [2010-05-19 03:52:20 +0000 UTC]

When are you free this week?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stephenc123 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-19 04:31:32 +0000 UTC]

Hmmmm Friday?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to stephenc123 [2010-05-19 04:44:58 +0000 UTC]

'Kay. We'll do watch it together Friday.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stephenc123 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-19 04:51:59 +0000 UTC]

Okies ^__^ Meow!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

craigsbro22 In reply to ??? [2010-05-18 00:31:53 +0000 UTC]

back storie? this is totally lulz!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to craigsbro22 [2010-05-18 00:56:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mecheesy In reply to ??? [2010-05-17 22:21:31 +0000 UTC]

I just saw it this weekend, It was alot cleaner, especially for the direction they went with using high school kids. I liked that the kids were ones that were in touch with their morality and knew they were in a dangerous situation that could kill them, unlike in previous movies where the victims thought of how they could humiliate the killer and angrily "kick some ass" all while hooking up at the same time. New Nightmare was beautiful, It was different and WAY ahead of it's time like you said. While I was watching Nightmare on Elm Street I thought I was going to fan girl scream everytime I saw him on the screen because I was remembering Rory, but I didn't. I did get fan girly though (how can you not?!?! ) but not because I was thinking of Watchmen, but because my brain got attached to the movie. The ending was perfect, it led me wanting more, like Freddy usually does. This Freddy was such an evil bastard, that I have completely fallen in love all over again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Mecheesy [2010-05-19 14:57:00 +0000 UTC]

I saw the film opening weekend and I loved the film! I've seen it six times to date. This remake was just classy! When was the last time you saw a classy horror, let alone a classy film in general? Next to Wes Craven's New Nightmare, the 2010 remake is the perfect Nightmare film. The story flows great, the acting is wonderful, the cinematography is gorgeous, the editing is nice, the dialogue is quite good. There's no sex, no nudity, the blood and gore is minimal, and the swearing is tasteful. They took subject matter that was vile, child abuse and molestation, and executed it with sophistication. It even have animal cruelty; animals never die in films and children are rarely ever in danger in films! I agree that I really loved the fact that the kids were in touch with their morality, too -- that they were genuinely scared. I admit that I miss the Heather Langenkamp Nancy's "asskickery" and I congratulate her on her spunk, but the whole Home Alone boobie trap thing didn't ring true in the original 1984 film. I loved how Rooney Mara's Nancy is awkward and shy and a little strange, full of self-doubt. I like that a great deal more. I also love the chaste kiss between Nancy and Quentin. Instead of Freddy stalking about and "playing with his food" as he did with the others, he didn't do any of that to Quentin later; oh, no, Freddy was jealous and went all out on him! I loved that! On that note, Jackie Earle Haley's Freddy Krueger was chilling and orgasmic! I didn't know whether to be creeped out by him or turned on by him... I always had a thing for Robert Englund's Freddy, but Jackie has made it sooooo much worseeeee! I loved that they didn't humiliate him, that he remained scary and, as a 20-year fan of the franchise, I really appreciate that. The practical effects were excellent. The CGI was, unfortunately, unspectacular and were the only true flaw of the film, but I'm a animator, so I'm trained to see those things. Nonetheless, they were effective and that's what counts in the end. (Hollywood forgets that CGI should assist the film, not be bogged down by it.) The film, also, didn't hold back:  It took risks and it was smart and classy! I loved that they used "what you see in your mind is far worse than what you see on screen" tactic and far more terrifying. There was nothing superfluous about the film. The ending was fantastic! I actually screamed "YES! CLOSURE!" at the end of the film, yet I loved that they kept it ambiguous enough for a sequel. (And Jackie and Rooney have signed on to do two sequels.) Definitely one of the best films (particularly for a remake) I've seen in a long, long time!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aisha-Autumn In reply to ??? [2010-05-16 16:43:15 +0000 UTC]

I absolutely agree with you, the new film is simply remarkable that critics and people who do not consider this film terrible would speak. Personally for us in two cinemas where I have had time to look this remarkable film, people shouted for horror and after a film still for a long time were afraid of sharp sounds.
The new personaliti of Nensi is especially fine - it has turned out the non-standard and interesting heroine, and this love line between her and Freddi...
But the end became the smartest moment of a film...
With impatience I wait for the second film. I hope, it will turn out same remarkable, as the first.
Sorry for my bad English...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Aisha-Autumn [2010-05-16 19:28:41 +0000 UTC]

Your English is fine, no worries!

I'm so happy you gave the remake a chance by watching it and I'm also really glad. It's sad that critics and fans aren't giving this film a chance to prove itself. I love, too, Nancy in the remake. I love that she isn't the typical "heroine". I love how she remains stalwart and strong through the film, and she doesn't really scream until the very end in the film. I ADORE the film's end! We had closure at last, but it was ambiguous enough to make the film wide open for a sequel! And Jackie Earle Haley and Rooney Mara have signed up to make two sequels -- a trilogy sounds really nice! I hope they keep it as classy as the first film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtemisLoki In reply to ??? [2010-05-12 00:09:22 +0000 UTC]

I just got back from seeing the movie a second time. This just made my day. I couldn't stop myself from sitting there and smiling like an idiot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 00:22:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad this brought a smile to your face. That's really sweet for you to say. I hope you enjoyed the film a second time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 00:23:59 +0000 UTC]

Loved it. My memory can be pretty bad sometimes, so I got a good refresher on scenes and lines. I almost had the theater to myself, but last minute three other people came in. Oooh, I want this movie on DVD now!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 02:00:26 +0000 UTC]

It must stay in theatres longer! Must have more fans! Must get more money for the sequels! Then we'll see how DVD sales go.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 02:09:08 +0000 UTC]

I'll do my best to wait, but its gonna be so hard. And I reread your artist comment, I know we where supposed to be creeped out by him, but he was just so much of a turn on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 02:13:17 +0000 UTC]

It was both. I was both creeped out my him and turned on by him. It was sooooo confusing! I'm getting mixed signals!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 02:15:55 +0000 UTC]

I know, I kinda hope they do a novelization of the movie, just for the extra scenes and stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 02:25:22 +0000 UTC]

That would be interesting. Maybe you should read the early script.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 02:47:34 +0000 UTC]

Do you possibly have a link where I can find it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 03:38:45 +0000 UTC]

I can email it to you. It's a PDF file. I warn you the script is pretty awful. And you read what was original intention for the poloriods. It was Freddy raping Nancy with gardening tools.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 03:42:59 +0000 UTC]

O.O. What!?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 04:51:43 +0000 UTC]

It was my favourite part of the script. I wanted that scene to be in the film. However, they took away the case file report that insinuated that the poloriods were of Freddy raping Nancy with gardening tools. Nevertheless, the poloriods remained. The "contents" weren't specified, nevertheless we had a vague idea of what they were about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 04:53:21 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm stil pretty interested in reading the script, I'll note you my script.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 05:26:19 +0000 UTC]

Sent. Tell you how you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 16:47:26 +0000 UTC]

I didn't get it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 17:03:18 +0000 UTC]

Resent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 17:05:48 +0000 UTC]

Okay, I got it. Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 17:09:28 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! You get to read the original death of Dean via the pool/greenhouse scene.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 17:12:49 +0000 UTC]

I saw the pictures for that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 17:13:52 +0000 UTC]

The ones I showed you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 17:16:29 +0000 UTC]

I don't remember if you sent me a link or not, I found them via [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 17:44:55 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm...most of those I have, but not all. Here's the a few others things that were in the trailers and featurettes but not in the final cut of the film that aren't mentioned on the forum:

[link] - Missing shot in the fire scene.

[link] , [link] - Missing shots of Freddy's full silhouette coming toward the camera.

[link] - Missing scene of Freddy making his glove. His shot wasn't shown in the forum.

[link] - Missing scene of Kris going down a hallway at Dean's pool party scene.

[link] - Missing shot of Freddy's shadow on the boiler room wall.

[link] - Missing shot of opening the eye, I assume Quentin's eye.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 18:06:40 +0000 UTC]

Nice, I hope the dvd has deleted scenes, those are always so much fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 18:41:08 +0000 UTC]

I hope they don't make it exclusive to the Blu-Ray. They did that with Dark Knight and Repo! the Genetic Opera. DVD got nothing and Blu-Ray got all the fun stuff. I hate being excluded because I can't afford a Blu-Ray player.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 18:47:12 +0000 UTC]

I know, I feel the same. When I learned about the Repo! deleted scenes I was so happy, then I just about cried when I found out it was for BluRay only. They've done that for so many that I want so badly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 18:56:00 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I'm a special feature whore! I hate Digital Copy DVDs sooooo much! I don't want to buy two copies of the same film! I want special features, bitch!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 18:59:25 +0000 UTC]

I know, I've been so upset, having bought a dvd hoping to get some awesome special features, but instead getting a dvd copy only or just a dvd copy and no features.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 19:04:03 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. I hate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 19:10:10 +0000 UTC]

I know they're still trying to push the idea of BluRay, but its completely unfair to people like us. Plus I think BluRay tries to do too much and looks somewhat complicated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 19:10:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it does. Blech.

How's the script going?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 19:21:17 +0000 UTC]

I haven't started it yet. I'll start it now. I was doing some necessary studying for summer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>