HOME | DD

tranimation-art — DeviantID IV

Published: 2010-05-09 03:00:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 5195; Favourites: 66; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description "I'm your boyfriend now, Nancy..."

I support the Platinum Dunes' Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) reboot, and let me tell you why: The original film, the first Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), is near perfect — that is, until the last five minutes! The production ran out of money and creator-writer-director Wes Craven couldn't film the original climax in the script, so he had to slap something together and we got the infamous car scene. This ending made no sense in the context of the story and came completely out of left-field — it was a Big-Lipped Alligator Moment — where it just ends abruptly, with little to no explanation, leaving the audience scratching their head in complete confusion! Nevertheless, every kid remembers being scared to death by Freddy Krueger after watching it! I find that people have forgotten that the first film was actually a serious, cerebral "mind fuck" of a horror film that straddled between psychological terror and splatter/slasher, which made it fresh and new — and Freddy was originally a serious monster that was, in fact, a child molester and serial murderer. Subsequently, five sequels went by, one by one, over the span of a decade, which spiraled down in quality each time, focusing more on cheesy comedy and moving further and further away from the scariness and intelligence of the original. It turned Freddy into an icon, but with great sacrifice: The character had evolved into a "clown" and the films just became a joke! Little kids started running around with Freddy gloves (which is really messed up when you think about it)! And this is when Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994) came in...

Just when I thought the franchise had ran its course and Freddy could do no more, the seventh film New Nightmare blew me away! Wes Craven returned to the series after years of avoidance, with a bigger budget and more freedom, and he went out to "remake" the original 1984 film the way it was meant to be, but still transform it into something new and completely original. The film takes the phrase "art imitating life" to a whole new meaning; it ran like a reality show (before they became popular) and a behind-the-scenes documentary in one, where the cast of the first film (now ten years older), including its crew and executives, are playing themselves in a pseudoistic real-life setting! New Nightmare brought the character of Freddy Krueger back to what Wes Craven originally intended him to be, back to his original child molester-murderer roots — the personification of evil! He was darker, sicker, scarier, more menacing than ever before, and I was happy beyond all belief! Freddy Krueger has finally earned back his claws! And it brought back the original ending of the first film, with action and emotions and closure! New Nightmare was a praised by critics, but was box office failure. Audiences just didn't like it, which was a damn shame; and, I feel, there were two main reasons behind this: (1) The Nightmare franchise is a series primarily remembered by its sequels. We were introduced to Freddy during the original film, primarily as kids who shouldn’t have been watching it in the first place and, for a solid decade, we watched the sequels, primarily as teenagers! Audiences were used to and were expecting "Freddy the Clown." This was "recon" before it existed! Nobody fuckin' expected that! They didn’t want to be scared; they wanted to laugh! There's a hypocrisy to this that just blows my mind! (2) Up to this point, nobody had ever seen a film like this! Nothing like this had never been done! It was too original, too self-aware, too ahead of its time. It didn't just push down the fourth wall, it shattered it — it was too real too soon! And a few years later, what happens? Wes Craven moved to Dimension Films and churned out Scream (1996), which was a blender re-packaging of New Nightmare, and it became an international blockbuster — what bullshit! And you know what's worse? The next film was Freddy vs. Jason, which brought back the "clown" and I was pissed beyond belief!

Now, don't get me wrong, I love Robert Englund and I always will. Jackie Earle Haley isn't Robert Englund, he will never be Robert Englund, and he's not even trying to be: Jackie is going to be Jackie! Freddy hasn't never truly been done the way he was suppose to be, and the film itself has never truly been done the way it was suppose to be! But if there's a franchise that needs to be rebooted/re-conned/remade/revitalized, it's Nightmare on Elm Street! And we're getting the 2010 Platinum Dunes remake, with Jackie Earle Haley as Freddy — and whether or not the film does well, we, at least, got Freddy back to his roots! No more jokes! No more clowns! He's a serial killer again! He's a child molester again! He's a rapist again! He's not a character you're suppose to like! He is the ultimate monster! He is the ultimate badass! The remake should not be compared to the original films. It's a different film entirely and should be judged as a completely different animal...

I saw the film opening weekend and I loved the film! I've seen it six times to date. This remake was just classy! When was the last time you saw a classy horror, let alone a classy film in general? Next to Wes Craven's New Nightmare, the 2010 remake is the perfect Nightmare film. The story flows great, the acting is wonderful, the cinematography is gorgeous, the editing is nice, the dialogue is quite good. There's no sex, no nudity, the blood and gore is minimal, and the swearing is tasteful. They took subject matter that was vile, child abuse and molestation, and executed it with sophistication. It even have animal cruelty; animals never die in films and children are rarely ever in danger in films! Jackie Earle Haley's Freddy Krueger was chilling and orgasmic! I didn't know whether to be creeped out by him or turned on by him... The practical effects were excellent. The CGI was, unfortunately, unspectacular and were the only true flaw of the film, but I'm a animator, so I'm trained to see those things. Nonetheless, they were effective and that's what counts in the end. (Hollywood forgets that CGI should assist the film, not be bogged down by it.) The film, also, didn't hold back:  It took risks and it was smart and classy! I loved that they used "what you see in your mind is far worse than what you see on screen" tactic and far more terrifying. There was nothing superfluous about the film. Definitely one of the best films (particularly for a remake) I've seen in a long, long time! If you haven't seen it, watch it! I recommend the film to horror and non-horror fans alike!

Behold my new DeviantID! I took a photo of myself in front of the poster of the Nightmare on Elm Street remake at my local cinema, replacing myself with Nancy, as I screamed my head off in either terror or excitement... (Maybe this is due to the fact that I'm looking up at his crotch. )

Promotions of the Film:

          - Trailer #1
          - Trailer #2
          - Trailer #3
          - Behind-the-scenes featurette
          - An "adorkable" interview with Jackie Earle Haley
          - A fantastic visit to the film set

Clips from the Film (which excited me to no end!):

          - Clip #1
          - Clip #2 (Gorgeous!)
          - Clip #3 (Eee!)
          - Clip #4

Medium - Photoshop.

A Nightmare on Elm Street © Wes Craven/Platinum Dunes/New Line Cinema.
Related content
Comments: 364

tranimation-art In reply to ??? [2010-05-12 19:37:40 +0000 UTC]

Understandable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-12 22:50:47 +0000 UTC]

I may have gone through it somewhat quickly, but that was really bad! The dialouge was just, ugh and I didn't like how everyone treated Nancy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-12 23:10:20 +0000 UTC]

I KNOW! When I read the script, I just went "If they go by this script, I suppose the film will be, uh, FEAR, I guess. But I seriously hope they edit this down -- shave out the 'stupid' and go more 'serious'." Oddly, that's what they did. Some scenes were great. Others were, UGH! The pool scene made me cringe. And, yes, the dialogue is awful and the treatment of Nancy was pretty BLAH."

Aren't you glad of what we got in the final film? I was hoping they insinuate the "use of gardening tools" rape somewhere else, but I suppose that's what the sequels are for now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-13 00:06:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh my God, the final result was wonderful, and I have so much respect for these filmmakers now. Yes sequels indeed. Probably the only horror movie remake, that I get excited about when it comes to the idea of a sequel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-14 01:42:02 +0000 UTC]

As do I. I really hope the sequels stick to the classiness of the first film. I'd be so disappointed to see the remake series go downhill.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-14 03:53:10 +0000 UTC]

So would I. I want to see Freddy stay serious. This movie already proved that they could have a serious Freddy and still have him say something funny without loosing that. Heck tha seriousness actually made thoses lines even better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-14 04:36:28 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. It seems to more on the Freddy-Nancy relationship/romance/rivalry and I'm AlLLL for that. I loved their chemistry together. I'm eager to see what story they'll do this time around. Freddy didn't kill ALL of the preschool kids as far as we know. I'd love to see Nancy go into psychology major, like she did in the third film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-14 04:59:36 +0000 UTC]

Yes the Freddy-Nancy relationship, was well done in this. Not to mention, I could be wrong in saying this my memory of the original series is a little hazy, but it was nice to see Freddy with some genuine anger in him.



I know, I would like the see a sequel connect more with the third film in the original series, not to mention that Quentin, as far as we last say, is still alive. And Freddy will still be around as long as they remember him. I don't think it'll be so easy to forget "We just killed a guy who murdered our friends in their sleep and molested us when we were little", plus Nancy' got that whole he killed my mom thing on top of that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-14 20:23:53 +0000 UTC]

I always loved the Freddy-Nancy quasi-romance/rivalry/attraction/obsession/frienemies relationship. It was always in the original, but I love how they executed it in the remake. They took it to an area which was risky and morally wrong, and I completely approve of it.

I LOVE that Freddy got jealous over Quentin. He delighted in torturing him until Quentin and Nancy shared that chaste kiss and, instead of stalking him and teasing him as he did with all the other, Freddy played down and dirty for a instant kill. Unfortunately, all that adrenaline did the trick to keep him alive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-14 20:52:22 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, when I think about it I think of the New Nightmare quote, " Just because it's a love story doesn't mean it can't have a decapitation or two." Its that rivalry, obsession and twisted interest that makes it so enjoyable.




I really like Quentin, as Nancy's "boyfriend" (I can't remember if they where really dating or not), he actually did alot in the film and I mean that in no dissrespectic the the original Nancy's boyfriend. But seriously he took quite the damage from Freddy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-14 21:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Yep, that's always been my favourite quote from New Nightmare. Robert Englund and Heather Langenkamp called Freddy-Nancy a "romance". So does Jackie and Rooney from what I understand.

I loved Quentin. They weren't dating anytime through the course of the film. They were best friend, although Quentin desired more than that and Nancy pushed it away. They did discuss dating in the car and, as a result, the kiss was impulsive. I liked how much more active the "boyfriend" role is in the remake. I like Johnny Depp's Glen, but Quentin was just more real and had more to do. I did love the fact that Quentin became the pill-popper and Nancy avoided it all together, which was the reverse of the original film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-14 21:26:04 +0000 UTC]

I really like how all the roles of the movies where expanded or changed. It was nice to see thought put into the characters as well as the story. Plus I think it was nice to see Freddy with regular blood.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-14 21:33:04 +0000 UTC]

Me, too. And I agree with you about Freddy's anger. It's really refreshing to see Freddy ANGRY and acting rather NORMAL with clear psychological problems, which he takes delight in. He feels rage, anger, sympathy, lust, fear, etc. He even seems a little sad about becoming a dream demon. I like that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-14 21:44:05 +0000 UTC]

Yes, and I enjoy how he tricks them into going to the preschool. And how he purposely kept Nancy from sleeping so she wouldn't wake up. It just lets your mind wonder how the story would've ended if Quentin had died, or if Nancy and him had fallen into comas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-14 22:16:18 +0000 UTC]

I love that he wants them to remember what he did to them. The more they remember, the stronger he gets. I do love that Freddy keeps Nancy awake. But I was a little confused that he wants to puncher her heart. I figured he would want her to keep her alive longer in his world to play with her. I also love that Quentin says he's going this because "we told the truth", but later Freddy tells Nancy that "this is what you did to me." So it was really Nancy's confession that started it and the other children followed.

How would it happened if Quentin have died or Nancy would have never woken up? I assume Freddy would have repeated his rape with gardening tools, as he did in the poloriods to Nancy, let her watch the other preschool teens die before he killed her.

I had a horrible insomnia one time where I couldn't sleep for four days. By the 3 1/2 mark, I started hallucinating, or micro-naps. The mixture of the fumes and lack of a sleep, I saw salmon swimming in the air at a gas station. I reached out and my hand went THROUGH the windshield and I grabbed a fish. It felt and smelt just like a fish and struggled to free itself from my hand. When my friend asked me if I was okay, I said, "No, I don't think I am."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-14 22:24:51 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah, or even do all that and show her what he exactly show what he did to everyone when they were still in preschool. I mean after he put her in that dress and got on top of her, it just shocked to even think what he was going to do to her.



Oh wow, that's something. I gotta be honest I don't know what to fully say to that, but I'm glad you're okay now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-15 17:56:00 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but he at least kept evidence or "trophies" of Nancy. I didn't see him have any for the other kids. Then again, she's his favourite.

When he got on top of her, I went, "WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO HER?!?!"

Yeah, it was a WEIRD experience. Who needs drugs when you can stay awake for four days?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-15 18:14:14 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. The pre-burned moments with her where cute as hell though. Like when they showed them painting on the walls.


The same thought comes to mind when he's running his fingers over the dress. Like what it was true that she only set the clock in her dreams during that scene where he licked her?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-15 18:22:11 +0000 UTC]

Pre-burned Freddy is ADORABLE! I'd bare his children; well, if he wasn't a pedophile. I did love the scene where he and Nancy painted the wall of the cave, then again it was always EXCEEDINGLY creepy. I did love that Nancy's "figure" was always present in all of her drawings. It's on the mirror, it's in his current pictures, it's on her childhood drawings, on the wall of the cave. The "figure" is always AROUND her. I assume that's a subconscious drawing of Freddy, a shadow that always looms around her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-15 18:26:19 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, pedophilia aside, pre-burned Freddy is the most huggable person I've ever seen. Honestly I didn't anyone could look so cute, while playing with kids (which sorta sounds wrong given the circumstances). Yeah I think there was one or a few on her wall as well. She can't help it. They never compeltely explain who started to remember Freddy first, your lead to asume it was one of the teens we didn't see or even Dean, but with those weird figures you could assume it was Nancy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-15 18:44:34 +0000 UTC]

I agree! It was difficult to see any sort of "evil" from the man. That scene with him and Nancy talking about her drawing did come off as creepy. And they just HAD to play with blood-red paint for the wall, didn't they?

I always assumed it was Nancy who first remember. It was a germ in her head, with the "figure" -- if that does represent Freddy in some way. (You're right. It could represent Nancy just as much.) But then again, it could have been Dean. He went to a psychologist and started going back to his childhood. As the kids remember more and more, Freddy becomes more and more powerful. As Dean remembers, he begins to make the other kids remember as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-15 20:53:28 +0000 UTC]

That leads to a question of, if they did a sequel how would it be done? I mean does Platinum Dunes' version of Freddy have an interest in going after other kids/teens or just the ones responsible for his death, which leaves Nancy and Quentin. Or like how far a gap in time would there be for the sequel?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-16 02:02:15 +0000 UTC]

Actually, there were some preschool students that Freddy has not killed yet, so there's a possibility they'll be more "victims." We don't know how far the gap is. But there is a rumour that Platinum Dunes wants the sequel to be done in 3D, which makes me cringe, since it takes me back to Freddy's Dead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-16 03:10:30 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I wasn't aware of survivors, I thought Nancy said that Freddy got to them all.


I read something mentioning that. They said that it would be in 3D if the script was written to be in 3D, and while that is a bad idea, at least nowadays they make it where there's a 3D version and a regular version. I hope they don't do a 3D oriented script.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-16 04:20:19 +0000 UTC]

Well, she said that. But she didn't cross out ALLLL the faces of the children, so I figured there were a FEW left.

True, there is a 2D version along with the 3D, but usually 3D is just a bad sign. Because it becomes a spectacle and sacrifice character development and story in order to make it "dazzling" for people in 3D glasses.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-16 04:28:00 +0000 UTC]

Well, lets hope that the writer's are wise enough to take the smarter road and leave the movie in 2D. I mean I admire how they fought to keep the movie in 2D instead of letting it be made into a 3D film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-16 04:35:10 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. I hope they keep it that way. I hope the 3D thing is just a RUMOUR and stays a RUMOUR. Also, I hope Nancy doesn't DIE in this film as she did in the original series in the third film. That made me SOOOOOO UPSET! If Nancy's going to die, she has to bring Freddy down with her! No question about it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-16 04:48:14 +0000 UTC]

I know, especially with the connection running so much deeper in this. It was a tiny bit weird watching the films go by without Nancy going up against Freddy, she was just such a driving point for him.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-16 04:56:45 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. They're the ULTIMATE enemies. It's always weird to see Pinhead to go against anyone else other than Kirsty. And, in return, it's just as weird to see Freddy go against anyone other than Nancy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-16 05:13:17 +0000 UTC]

So true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-16 05:49:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-30 22:15:59 +0000 UTC]

:smile: I know this conversation is over, but I'm so happy, I went to Phoenix ComiCon and I got a Fred Kruger (pre-burned) figure

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-30 22:21:33 +0000 UTC]

(fumes with jealousy) I've been trying to find one and I can't! I want one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-30 22:24:33 +0000 UTC]

Hate to make you jealous. They had a burned freddy one too, but I didn't have the money for that.

Maybe you should try amazon or a local comic shop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-30 22:34:47 +0000 UTC]

:cries) Me want both!

Every time I go to the comic book store, I buy comics...and I always forget about the action figures and I have no idea why that is...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-30 22:38:41 +0000 UTC]

I want both too, although I never open my figures, for 1 I have no place to really put them and too I'm always scared of something happening too them.


XD, I do that sometimes too. I mainly remember if I go in there with no original intention of buying anything or when I'm left there waiting for someone.


Maybe you should try Hot Topic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-30 23:30:53 +0000 UTC]

I'm the exact opposite. I have to free the little figures from their packaging prisons immediately after I buy them; even if I have no room, I'll MAKE room or, at least, try to.

I'll have to try out the Hot Topic and see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-30 23:35:38 +0000 UTC]

XD


Yeah, I remember going to a Hot Topic and they had the old Freddy figure (which I want), so I'm just guessing that they may also have the new Freddy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-31 00:01:13 +0000 UTC]

I've been trying to get my hands on a pre-burned Robert Englund Freddy figure for some years now: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-31 00:13:06 +0000 UTC]

.........Oh My God. I didn't even know that existed!!! It's so awesome...OMG I want it know too. I just remembered of an awesome store located in/around Universal Studios Hollywood. I wonder if they would have it if I every go there again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-31 00:40:32 +0000 UTC]

It's a 12-inch-tall, limited edition Freddy doll: [link] , [link] , [link]

There's also a 6-inch plastic action figure as well. But it has a weird pose.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-31 00:46:35 +0000 UTC]

It looks so amazing.

Oh man, I hate when they do something weird with the figures, I mean, I may sound picky, but I don't care how much I like the character I won't buy it if there's something really off about it, like the pose and even more common the face (I hate when they mess that up).

The JEH pre-burned Freddy, looks amazing, and I'm not sure how possible he is, but he's got a changeable hand. The burned-Freddy has changeable head, but its weird cause it doesn't look different.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-31 01:02:18 +0000 UTC]

Here's pics of the 6-inch action figure, It has a changeable head, but goddamnit that pose is just plain WEIRD: [link] , [link] , [link]

Oh, I hate it when they mess up the faces as well. They usually never look as good as picture on the box.

Does the pre-burned JEH Freddy comes with fire? I've technically only seen one picture that has him engulfed in fire, but I never seen any other pictures since that have it: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-31 01:08:42 +0000 UTC]

It is weird, but it looks okay with the burned Freddy head.

No, it didn't come with fire, I wonder if that's standard or not, I don't wanna think that I somehow bought a crappy knock of version. I don't think I did. The interchangable hand is just a normal hand, but its holding a garden tool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-31 01:27:22 +0000 UTC]

I like that the pre-burned Freddy is holding a gardening tool. In the early draft of the script, it's insinuated that Freddy raped/sodomized Little Nancy with a gardening tool. It gives a "sick" factor to action figure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-31 01:41:19 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I was happy to see that with the figure as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-31 05:08:37 +0000 UTC]

Is it awful that I want a Little Nancy to go with it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-31 05:56:20 +0000 UTC]

XD I don't think so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-05-31 06:01:52 +0000 UTC]

Damn. (with a halo under her devil horns)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-05-31 15:44:27 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>