HOME | DD

#legion #sfm #shepard #masseffect #femshep #masseffectshepard #sourcefilmmaker
Published: 2017-05-20 20:31:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 3221; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 41
Redirect to original
Description
That huge hole in Legion's chest always bothered me a bit... the geth see even windows as an unneccessary structural weakness, so why wouldn't Legion patch a huge hole that exposes his inner workings? Maybe he doesn't want to mess with the pieces of Shepard's old armor he used to repair himself? Maybe he wants to keep the armor "as is" for the same reasons he used it to repair himself with in the first place? If so, maybe Shepard is the only one who can patch that holeMade with SFM
Legion for GMod by NikouT
Shep for GMod by GoOr
"The patch" (junk metal plate), terminal and mainframe models by cire992 (Mass Effect prop packs)
Wall, railing, vent, floor (front) models by mark2580 (came with the Anderson's apartment map)
Additional effects by YoshiPoland (from SFM Workshop) and mark2580 (came with the Anderson's apartment map)
Floor model (back) converted from ME3 and some adjustments to other models and/or materials for SFM by me
And of course: huge thanks to Bioware for Mass Effect!
Related content
Comments: 19
BlueNose1982 [2021-06-03 15:38:48 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AlexanderSPb [2020-10-26 07:27:02 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Turpuli In reply to Romazeo [2018-02-14 19:42:13 +0000 UTC]
Heh, it's supposed to be a dirty, rusted peace of junk metal, but now that you say it... it actually does look like dirty plywood
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DannyAndYoko [2017-06-08 18:21:10 +0000 UTC]
Legion is a "they" not "him", there are 1183 Geth programs inside the "Legion" dubbed mobile platform.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turpuli In reply to DannyAndYoko [2017-06-08 22:55:46 +0000 UTC]
Hehe That fact and your avatar immediately reminded me of one of my favourite quotes: "you are technically correct, the best kind of correct"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Turpuli [2017-06-09 01:23:24 +0000 UTC]
Two rules!
1. I'm always right.
2. If I'm not right, see rule number 1.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobi121 [2017-05-21 11:29:16 +0000 UTC]
And then killing his people with the Red Blast.
I'M SORRY! T_T
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turpuli In reply to bobi121 [2017-05-21 13:44:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeah... I did that too, every time. Sorry, Legion (and other geth)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobi121 In reply to Turpuli [2017-05-21 19:08:27 +0000 UTC]
Although i take into consideration what the geth stood for and also what EDI said about the Reapers.
The Geth (Legion) admired humanity (Shepard) for refusing the gift of the Reapers (racial ascention) and for not using the gifts of technology the Reapers offered, saying that Shepard is being more like the geth for wanting to create our own future. For me Ascention = Synthesis and Foreign dangerous unknown technology = Control. The geth wanted independance and the only way to achieve it is Destroy.
EDI said that the Reapers must be defeated not because they threaten us with death but because of their very existence we fear them which kills us inside. In a way Control compromises what EDI stood for - freedom for every sentient species and also Synthesis is against what Mordin stood for as well - Universe demands diversity.
I continued the path of the geth - THERE WILL BE NO MORE COMPROMISE WITH THE OLD MACHINES. (A geth prime said this before the end).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turpuli In reply to bobi121 [2017-05-21 22:38:25 +0000 UTC]
I felt like the control option was like giving in and telling yourself that "maybe the Illusive Man was right after all"... I just wouldn't trust that. And synthesis? I felt that forcing a giant evolutionary step on everyone and pretty much eliminate all natural diversity is just not right, who am I to decide that for everyone (and everything). For me, the only way to end the war (and the cycles) was to get rid of the "old machines" once and for all, even though it meant the destruction of all other AI as well. I'd like to think that at least EDI and the geth would have chosen that too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
creodont In reply to Turpuli [2017-05-22 21:22:52 +0000 UTC]
The game had been telling us that Controlling the Reapers was the wrong choice since the prologue while the Synthesis choice was just thrown out with absolutely no foreshadowing in the game's technology nor any indication for how it was supposed to make sense (congratulations, everyone's now techno-organic, which means no war? And also Shepard somehow has to die for this to happen because reasons). Destroy was the choice that we'd had three games worth of content telling us was correct and arbitrarily killing EDI and the geth was only put in in order to make it seem like there was an alternative.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turpuli In reply to creodont [2017-05-22 21:36:05 +0000 UTC]
Yes! Totally agree! This pretty much summarizes it for me: "Destroy was the choice that we'd had three games worth of content telling us was correct and arbitrarily killing EDI and the geth was only put in in order to make it seem like there was an alternative." It was the only way we saw, the only goal we worked to achieve... right up until the very end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bobi121 In reply to Turpuli [2017-05-22 19:02:30 +0000 UTC]
The logic about Synthesis, that you don't have the right to make this decision applies for Control as well. You don't have the right to create a "God".
The Illusive man stood for one thing - using the Reapers to further advance humanity. Shepard argued with him that trying to Control the Reapers is too dangerous, risky, but also that even if someone could Control them, our society is not ready for this which is a very valid point. Not to mention that Legion said that by choosing to follow someone elses path, through technology or some other means, it leaves us blind to alternatives. Nazara (Sovereign) said it itself.
Also Shepard knew, especially after the Leviathan DLC, why the Reapers were created, before the Catalyst revealed it and still she wanted to end them by siding with Anderson and saying to TIM - Let us go and we will finish the rest.
Shepard clearly has a sense of disgust and at the same time pity for the Reapers. She hates what they are, the way they were created and is convinced that by killing a Reaper you let those harvested races finally find peace. Paragon interrupt to the Ranoch Reaper before it dies - You! I don't know from what race you were made but they are dead, millions of years ago, and now they can rest in peace.
It's like you want to Control contructs.
I personally choosed to Destroy the Collector base back in ME2 despite what the Illusive man told me - that it could save more lives and that with this knowledge we will advance even more. Why would i want to destroy the Collector base but not Destroy the Reapers? It makes no sense. The Illusive man said the same thing about the Reapers - that they can "help" us.
Control is for pro-Cerberus Shepard. A Shepard that thinks that the Reapers could be used as tools but at the same time that the Illusive man is not worthy to Control them.
I stand with Anderson - There is always another way - as he said it.
The Illusive man was under the Catalyst's control. He shoot Anderson and wanted to shoot me as well. Every action he did, every word that poured out of his mouth, happened because the Catalyst wanted it. When TIM started to doubt himself, when he realized what the Reapers truly are, the Catalyst tried to take over him again.
The Catalyst - He couldn't have controlled us because we controlled him.
If Shepard chooses to "Control" (she dies so she doesn't control them like the Illusive man wanted) the Reapers then it means that she thinks that the Reapers are necessary to exist, mine would not agree with this one bit and so i destroyed them.
Everyone (geth included) fought and died for one thing - for me to have the chance to use the Crusible in the way that it was meant to be used - DESTROY.
In the past Cycles there were two sides during a Reaper war - those who wanted to destroy them and those who wanted to control them. Those who wanted Control were always INDOCTRIANTED. Think about that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turpuli In reply to bobi121 [2017-05-22 21:26:25 +0000 UTC]
Destroy all the way! The number one selling point for me was this: "Everyone (geth included) fought and died for one thing - for me to have the chance to use the Crusible in the way that it was meant to be used - DESTROY."
Everyone worked together to assemble this huge thing hoping it would bring victory. Everyone got behind a single goal: destroy the reapers. For me, in the end there wasn't really a choice, it had to be done. The other "options" were just a final distraction, the last attempt to stop Shep from destroying the reapers. I know many others have less strict views about it and some prefer the other endings... but not me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobi121 In reply to Turpuli [2017-05-23 20:23:43 +0000 UTC]
Indeed. And now, while i got your blood pumping, make a FemShep Destroy ending picture with all that drama! :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobi121 In reply to Turpuli [2017-05-23 22:47:02 +0000 UTC]
Will watch your work closely till then. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0