HOME | DD

zeldat β€” Richard Armitage step by step

Published: 2011-07-06 17:33:39 +0000 UTC; Views: 1689; Favourites: 7; Downloads: 22
Redirect to original
Description I have an accompanying blog entry (which is TOO LONG) here: [link]

This is a step by step of my oil painting of Richard Armitage. (Finished piece can be seen here: [link] ) This was painted freehand with a photo reference. I did double-check the proportions in Photoshop (when I was almost finished with the painting) to see what needed to be fixed (see blog entry here: [link] ) but the actual painting was done freehand, warts, flaws, crooked eyes and all! (That explains why I somehow couldn't manage to get the top of his head to fit into the canvas! I'm such an idiot.)

What I show in this step-by-step is an example of the way a lot of traditional oil painters work, particularly when painting freehand. We first start with loosely "blocking in" the general shapes of the subject. Wait for that layer of paint to dry, then we refine the details and features, etc., until finally the thing is done. Wait until the very end to add highlights (like the catchlight in the eye).

Between each painting session, wait for the paint to dry to the touch before adding a new paint layer. If the paint is applied somewhat thickly, wait for the paint to be dry and dig the edge of your fingernail into a thicker paint strokeβ€”if there is no mark left in the paint stroke, it's dry enough. If a little indentation appears where you put your fingernail, wait a few days more. Also remember the "fat over lean" principleβ€”paint thin layers of paint first, then later if you want you can paint more thickly.

I also wanted to show this step-by-step tutorial as a "real world" example of how a traditional painting can progress. A freehand painting can sometimes look rather wonky when it's half-finished. There may be a lot of imperfections and therefore it can look different compared to how a painting can look when a grid is used, or when the artist traces over a photo or paints over a photo in Photoshop. (Those who are venturing into freehand traditional work should not expect beautiful perfection when their painting is half done!) Nor should the painting look like a paint-by-number where half is filled in and half is blank with just the outlines. (Maybe some oil painters do a freehand rendered painting that way, but to be honest I've never seen it, not ever.)

Another thing I mention in the blog entry is when some artists try to fake it, and pretend that they did the work one way (like painting freehand from scratch) when they did it another way (like painting over a photo or digitally manipulating a photo). I know that MOST artists would never dream of doing this, but just recently I've witnessed some dishonesty from artists so I thought it a good time to give my take on the subject.
Related content
Comments: 18

michaelstewart [2011-07-18 21:54:08 +0000 UTC]

I love this, reminds me of the warm colors that loomis and gil evergren use

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zeldat In reply to michaelstewart [2011-07-19 00:26:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, that is such a lovely thing to say!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

michaelstewart In reply to zeldat [2011-07-20 00:12:10 +0000 UTC]

Sure!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zeldat [2011-07-12 21:11:36 +0000 UTC]

In response to the "critique":

LOL! You are hilarious! I especially love this line:

"You can't plan it out well enough, because you have no talent."

You heard it here first. Anyone who doesn't fit their image into the frame at all times has no talent. Whatsoever. So says I-Bit-Graf-Orlok, so you know it must be true!

Everyone, go look at this drawing by her: [link] I wrote a critique for that drawing and recommend the Loomis book that she cites here.

The back story is that she has been giving out very abrasive, unsolicited critiques to hapless artists who didn't always accept her word as gospel. There was a big trainwreck of a thread about it on the forums. I had a few things to say, especially since I didn't like seeing other artists treated the way she was treating them.

One last thing:

"Your art isn't as good as you think."

Darling, nobody's is. Except for you. Apparently your own self-confidence is boundless!

"Try aiming for art like this: [link] and then I'll respect you a lot more."

And of course it has always been my deepest, fondest wish to earn the respect of I-Bit-Graf-Orlok!

TL;DR: Thanks for the laugh. You do not disappoint.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 4

michaelstewart In reply to zeldat [2011-07-18 21:51:15 +0000 UTC]

Looks like that guys drawings "Riven Phoenix" , maybe he got mad cuz you flamed him in the forum awhile back

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zeldat In reply to michaelstewart [2011-07-19 00:27:52 +0000 UTC]

I think that I-Bit is a teenage girl. I don't know what that thread regarding Riven was about, honestly. I had never heard of him before!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

michaelstewart In reply to zeldat [2011-07-20 00:12:05 +0000 UTC]

LOL!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

heathra In reply to zeldat [2011-07-16 20:12:59 +0000 UTC]

You know I don't claim to be this great artist but seriously after I have seen her drawings she really has no right to criticize! Wow...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zeldat In reply to heathra [2011-07-16 21:07:53 +0000 UTC]

I know, heathra, I know. All one has to do is look at her drawings and hopefully they'll see what's going on with her!

And you are a very talented artist!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Busoni In reply to zeldat [2011-07-16 02:41:18 +0000 UTC]

I like you. xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zeldat In reply to Busoni [2011-07-16 03:28:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackInfinity666 In reply to zeldat [2011-07-13 18:58:38 +0000 UTC]

That's the right way to respond. It's clear she was doing this out of pure vindictiveness~ I applaud you and think that you DO indeed have talent~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zeldat In reply to BlackInfinity666 [2011-07-13 20:17:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I really appreciate your comments!

Yeah! It's not a critique written with any intentions of being helpful. Anyone can say to anyone else that they have "no talent" or they're "bad" at this and "bad" at thatβ€”it's so easy to keep with the generalities because you don't have to go in depth explaining why.

That's a tip to anyone else reading this: If the person critiquing you in an overly harsh manner can't explain in specifics what the problem is, then maybe they are either 1) Throwing anything against the wall and hoping it'll stick (i.e. you'll buy it and be hurt) or 2) They don't know what they're talking about but hope to fool you into thinking that they do. Often both.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlackInfinity666 In reply to zeldat [2011-07-13 20:30:03 +0000 UTC]

I know, That's why I always reply the same way. I say "thanks I will take this into consideration" It makes everything neutral.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

I-Bit-Graf-Orlok [2011-07-12 20:48:53 +0000 UTC]

This really isn't as good as the above commenter says. But it's better than the 90% of the garbage that most of deviants churn out daily.

(That explains why I somehow couldn't manage to get the top of his head to fit into the canvas! I'm such an idiot.) So that's my point. You can't plan it out well enough, because you have no talent. I can almost guarantee you this was simply a paint over of some sort. First, it's extremely hard for me to build facial structure because I'm barely even stepping ahead of the beginner level, but that doesn't mean I can't see flaws in this one. The eyes aren't properly lined up, the face itself seems more stiff than anything else. I strongly suggest you read the Face and Hands part of the Loomis collection. That's what I've learned to do now. And my pieces look sooo much better because of it. The coloring seems a bit weak, and it doesn't appear like you knew too much how to control the oil. Let me tell you one thing: My grandfather was extremely skilled with oils, and he always told me that oils were the hardest paint to master. You haven't mastered it, that is quite obvious. What I would do is buy an actual book, a two or three hundred pages long book with all the information you'll need on oils and brushes and so on.

So yeah.

TL;DR: Your art isn't as good as you think. Try aiming for art like this: [link] and then I'll respect you a lot more.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

heathra In reply to I-Bit-Graf-Orlok [2011-07-16 20:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Don't tell someone they "have no talent" when clearly she does! If you are a little ahead of the "beginner" level do you think you should be really that critical? Come on! Everyone paints differently and paintings don't HAVE to be exact and they ever are if you are painting freehand. Some people paint more loosely than others and are more free with coloring but that doesn't mean it is weak or not good. I think it takes a talent to mix colors and be able to blend them which zeldat has done very well! I think you are very talented zeldat and don't let some 17 year old know and full of themselves say otherwise! As an artist myself I know talent when I see it and you definitely have it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jos2507 [2011-07-12 09:44:50 +0000 UTC]

so gooood !!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zeldat In reply to jos2507 [2011-07-12 21:13:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much, jos!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0