HOME | DD

bensen-daniel — Saatir

Published: 2014-06-24 12:40:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 983; Favourites: 10; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Text by
Saatir are mammal analogues, bearing live young and able to suckle them with their own milk. Tetraploid, each saatir cell has four sets of chromosomes. However, they produce monoploid gametes and it takes three individuals to produce offspring. Male fertilise females, who then pass on their fertilised ova to the other females for full fertilisation and implantation. This involves a complex mating system where there is sexual competition not only amongst the males, but females as well. Dominant females in general do not tend to get pregnant.
Males are larger than the females although some females are quite large. All have beards and females sport longer manes. Males and dominant females sport elaborate horns.
Saatir are almost erect bipeds, stooping slightly forward. They are digitigrade, with thigh, shin and metarsus of the same proportions. Saatir look like theropods or walking birds when walking.
They have a strong sense of smell and are easily aroused by the olfactory signals of other species, who consider them 'horny'.

~~~
Whew! Sorry for the wait! This is a saatir for  , who kindly read and critiqued my most recent novel, New Frontiers. www.thekingdomsofevil.com/?pag…
The deal is that whoever reads and critiques New Frontiers gets a picture of the alien (or whatever) of their choice, and here's Franzamm's. Description coming soon!
Related content
Comments: 9

grazatt [2018-12-16 06:54:24 +0000 UTC]

That would make a good Man from Leng.I came up with my own head cannon where they came from an alternate Earth or Earth millions of years in the future. Their resemblance to humans being the result of convergent evolution.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bensen-daniel In reply to grazatt [2018-12-18 13:48:09 +0000 UTC]

I didn't know about that part of the Cthulhu mythos! Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grazatt In reply to bensen-daniel [2018-12-20 15:21:06 +0000 UTC]

He is some good info about them
i.imgur.com/R6L4sbT.jpg
How they look
i0.wp.com/img-fotki.yandex.ru/…
Some of their music
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6DNx5…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bensen-daniel In reply to grazatt [2018-12-21 10:50:34 +0000 UTC]

Very horrific thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Heytomemeimhome [2014-07-03 07:02:41 +0000 UTC]

If their reproduction is so unearthly why do we still bother to make a difference between males and females, are there really males and females or is that just a constraint in our thinking based on our lives on earth?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bensen-daniel In reply to Heytomemeimhome [2014-07-03 08:27:38 +0000 UTC]

I can't speak for the author, since I didn't create this species. You have a point that both of the animals that don't bear the developing embryo could be called "male." I think the author's logic is that we call "female" any animal _capable_ of bearing children, even if in fact she implants the fetus in someone else. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Heytomemeimhome In reply to bensen-daniel [2014-07-04 00:06:04 +0000 UTC]

If she implants the fetus into something else isn't that technically parasitism?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

frazamm In reply to Heytomemeimhome [2014-07-07 07:21:09 +0000 UTC]

It is a form of parasitoidism that is balanced by the female host also contributing genetically to the developing embryo. Though both sexes act as 'male' their gametes are different and female gametes are larger, so I am basing it on that. There is also the fact that the females act in such a way as to be either males or females.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bensen-daniel In reply to Heytomemeimhome [2014-07-04 05:39:46 +0000 UTC]

The female2 (the one who bears the child) contributes genes to it, meaning her evolutionary interest is served, so the female1 isn't a parasite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0