HOME | DD

GoblinHood β€” robot story

Published: 2010-10-17 16:34:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 2068; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 35
Redirect to original
Description well, im working on a childrensbook story about a robot, i cant decide which kind of style i should use.

(btw, i just forget the birds!)
Related content
Comments: 46

Abistrakt [2011-12-07 03:08:24 +0000 UTC]

As a kid my favorite books were extremely illustrated. If I was a kid, yours would be my favorite for years to come.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to Abistrakt [2011-12-08 12:16:44 +0000 UTC]

hey thanks! im sure ill be doing as childrens book as one of my next projects with this robotguy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheseFourSocks [2011-04-23 06:57:07 +0000 UTC]

How about you meet it half way? Mix the styles.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to TheseFourSocks [2011-04-23 11:04:27 +0000 UTC]

yea, that i should be trying this out, thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alvry [2010-10-25 12:08:40 +0000 UTC]

I would use the right, personally, but they are both very exquisite.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dalek200 [2010-10-25 09:57:40 +0000 UTC]

to the right!

they both look cool though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to Dalek200 [2010-10-25 15:17:55 +0000 UTC]

thank ya!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Dalek200 In reply to GoblinHood [2010-10-25 17:30:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ACZ2013 [2010-10-25 09:54:37 +0000 UTC]

The first is more childish so I dub that one . Great work though on the second one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cachaca835 [2010-10-25 07:26:37 +0000 UTC]

Not knowing the story this might not work but what if you started with one and faded into the other as things progressed?

My vote is for the one on the right if you have to choose one. Both really good, though!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to cachaca835 [2010-10-25 15:18:29 +0000 UTC]

sounds like a good idea to me, maybe i try this just for fun

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mentallyxunstable [2010-10-25 07:08:14 +0000 UTC]

The left is a great style for preschool kids because there's not too much information for them to visually process, and the character is cute, simple, and memorable. But for an age group beyond that I'd go for the second, because they'll be able to appreciate that artistic beauty more. I mean, I have two little cousins who are five and six, and they're gravitating to stuff like that now. :> You could combine them a little too - regardless of age kids like relating to a character and giving the character in the right image eyes could make it more appealing to little kids. Unless you're really good at giving the character personality in its movements, in which case it might not be necessary. Either way, beautiful job! I love both of them 8D (Though the second's my personal favorite)

Eugh, my comment is long D:>

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to mentallyxunstable [2010-10-26 08:09:25 +0000 UTC]

wow, amazing comment. very many thanks!

sometimes i think i should do those two styles...coz all the meanings were going in the end on 50/50. thats also a good sign coz for sure i will not get "wrong" with anything!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mentallyxunstable In reply to GoblinHood [2010-10-28 01:36:05 +0000 UTC]

No problem, I'm glad it was useful!

Ah, that is a good sign! 8D Best of luck to you, and I'm sure whatever you produce will be splendid. ;D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xRuiei [2010-10-23 18:47:59 +0000 UTC]

i personally like the second one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lufiana [2010-10-22 00:40:39 +0000 UTC]

simply awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KajaCamorra [2010-10-19 19:17:37 +0000 UTC]

I love them both but I think the first pic is better suited for kids ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

magnusti78 [2010-10-18 16:43:34 +0000 UTC]

right one, definately!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ElisaAyala [2010-10-18 15:14:24 +0000 UTC]

woooooow! I love this!
I like both, but most the right one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PhillDante [2010-10-18 14:57:44 +0000 UTC]

I like the second style, but it's a bit too 'complicated' or 'busy' for children.
The first style is also just a bit too simple...
Maybe combining the two styles in some way may get the desired result, but like someone said above, maybe showing more preview work will help you reach your decision...

I hope it helped...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spazzPP2 [2010-10-17 21:41:09 +0000 UTC]

go on!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gene-technology [2010-10-17 21:13:40 +0000 UTC]

Ich hab meinen ewig schlaflosen kleinen Cousin um Rat gefragt und er ist total eingenommen vom rechten - wobei, er ist schon 8, also weiß ich nicht, inwiefern das noch passt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to gene-technology [2010-10-18 07:09:31 +0000 UTC]

ja, sicher sind 8-JΓ€hrige auch eine shr gute Zielgruppe, dankΓΆ! ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Betelgeuze01 [2010-10-17 20:52:15 +0000 UTC]

go for the right one!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Songwind [2010-10-17 19:18:56 +0000 UTC]

What age group is this story for? For very little kids, I'd go with the left, maybe w/ even brighter colors. The right is a bit too desaturated to catch their attention.

OTOH, I think that a slightly older audience (6-10?) would think the detail of the right hand panel was cool.

My six year old says he likes the picture on the right better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to Songwind [2010-10-17 20:22:13 +0000 UTC]

lovely comment! i prefer the suggestion of your daughter, hehe

...this book is likely for childrens who start reading such as 5-6 years old. so im very glad to get even a comment of your daughter...send her very many thanks! this is really helping.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Songwind In reply to GoblinHood [2010-10-18 03:01:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I'll let my son know his feedback was helpful.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperKaninja [2010-10-17 19:16:24 +0000 UTC]

Ne Mischung aus beidem

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to SuperKaninja [2010-10-17 20:22:41 +0000 UTC]

och immer diese 50-50-dinger ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kitiekat4U [2010-10-17 18:41:41 +0000 UTC]

children love color and realistic i think the one on the right.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to kitiekat4U [2010-10-17 20:25:56 +0000 UTC]

maybe i should even try to give it a lil bit more color, thanks for your comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kitiekat4U In reply to GoblinHood [2010-10-17 21:12:52 +0000 UTC]

cant wait to see your new book.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Prizrensoldier [2010-10-17 18:05:51 +0000 UTC]

The right one is definitley the MORE ARTISTIC ONE
but personaly i'd prefer the left one
It has another emotion-level

good luck^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

basugasubakuhatsu [2010-10-17 17:43:09 +0000 UTC]

I like the right one better.

I believe that just because it's a children's book, it doesn't really mean that the art has to be done in a sketchy, doodle-y style. Hope that helped.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to basugasubakuhatsu [2010-10-17 17:44:15 +0000 UTC]

helped alot, but still opinions are around 50/50, i guess...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bolsterstone [2010-10-17 17:39:09 +0000 UTC]

The right is really good - but given that it is a children's book, I'd look for something in the middle.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to bolsterstone [2010-10-17 17:43:10 +0000 UTC]

...so i take the black line? hehe!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bolsterstone In reply to GoblinHood [2010-10-17 18:32:14 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mechanicalhemiola [2010-10-17 17:29:27 +0000 UTC]

if it would work, perhaps both: the painterly style for the backgrounds, and the shaky cute line-art for the characters and elements he interacts with.... I say this because both have benefits for this genre and the schism would help direct the eye, particularly young eyes; the painterly style has depth, but the line-art is more accessible and friendly. just an idea.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to mechanicalhemiola [2010-10-17 17:42:48 +0000 UTC]

maybe i really should try to work something out between both of them, thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kokaInum [2010-10-17 17:28:18 +0000 UTC]

both great personally i like the right one more

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yi6i7 [2010-10-17 16:59:27 +0000 UTC]

umm..may be you should print a simple 3-4 page of demo and choose with your friends children?I liked sketchy one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

GoblinHood In reply to yi6i7 [2010-10-17 17:02:33 +0000 UTC]

i will do that for sure, hope this will not end in a 50/50 decission

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yi6i7 In reply to yi6i7 [2010-10-17 17:00:59 +0000 UTC]

btw if my comment is offensive, I'm so sorry :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GoblinHood In reply to yi6i7 [2010-10-17 17:13:54 +0000 UTC]

no way, im glad you gave that comment, hehe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

0985 [2010-10-17 16:56:56 +0000 UTC]

i liked the first style

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0