HOME | DD

Khylov — Inundation

Published: 2004-02-26 18:59:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 3297; Favourites: 54; Downloads: 334
Redirect to original
Description “In eastern Montana, there is a controversy over whether dinosaurs lived into the Tertiary. The K/T boundary in this area is defined by a floral change, but it is also associated with a weak iridium anomaly (an original report of a significant Ir anomaly turned out to be contamination from a platinum ring worn by a technician preparing the samples for analysis). Dinosaurs have been found above the defined K/T boundary from at least six different sites, while ungulates, normally considered ‘Tertiary’, have been found below the boundary.” –The Extinction of the Dinosaurs; M. Oard; CEN Tech J., vol. 11, no. 2, 1997, p.148 {Gradual dinosaur extinction and simultaneous ungulate radiation at the Hell Creek Formation; Science, 232:629-633; Dinosaurs from the Paleocene part of the Hell Creek Formation, McCone County, Montana. Palaios, 2:296-302; Mass Extinction: fact or fallacy? In: The Mass Extinction Debates: How Science Works in a Crisis, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Ca., p.233,234}

“…when someone finds a relatively intact dinosaur skeleton, for instance, consider that it had to be buried quickly to form in the first place. Consider also that most such fossils are found in huge graveyards, often within layers of rock (such as the Dakota Sandstone in the USA) that cover hundreds of thousands of square km. Then ask yourself whether we see things like that happening on the Earth today….a massive global hydraulic cataclysm is a much more logical explanation for the existence of ‘billions of dead things, laid down by water, all over the Earth.’” –Creation Archive, Vol.24 Issue 4, The Vanishing Giant

“To preserve such features, it is obvious that the creature needs to be buried quickly. Not just that, but the enclosing sediment needs to harden fairly quickly. If it stayed soft and unconsolidated for years, the fact that oxygen, moisture and bacteria could easily access the carcass means that one would very quickly have a disintegrated, stinking mess.…The silent testimony of the billions of well-preserved (fossils) is, by the most obvious common sense, to rapid processes—rapid burial and rapid hardening (of the encasing sediment). Sadly, the mindset of our culture is such that most people miss the obvious, and continue to think ‘slow and gradual’ when they see fossils—even beautifully preserved ones…” –Creation Archive, Vol.19 Issue 4, Fast Fossils

“Defining the K/T boundary based on the last dinosaur is also a circular definition, since scientists claim that the dinosaurs only lived in the Mesozoic when the presence of a dinosaur automatically defines the strata as Mesozoic. For instance, dinosaur remains from France and India were discovered in what were considered ‘Tertiary’ strata. The strata were subsequently redefined as ‘Cretaceous’!” –The Extinction of the Dinosaurs; M. Oard; CEN Tech J., vol. 11, no. 2, 1997, p.148 {Dinosaur Egglaying and Nesting in France; Dinosaur Eggs and Babies; Cambridge Univ. Press, London, p.57; Upper Cretaceous dinosaur eggs and nesting sites from the Deccan volcano-sedimentary province of peninsular India; ibid, p.208}

“Many fossils and artifacts have been found ‘out of place.’7 That is, they are in strata that the evolutionist says represent a period of time when, for example, that organism did not live, or human artifacts could not have been made. There are plenty of examples; some published in respectable journals before the evolutionary paradigm became locked in. Such examples do not get published in modern standard evolutionary journals, possibly because it is inconceivable that such could exist in the evolutionary worldview. In another context, Nobel Prize winner Sir Fred Hoyle said,

‘Science today is locked into paradigms. Every avenue is blocked by beliefs that are wrong, and if you try to get anything published by a journal today, you will run up against a paradigm, and the editors will turn it down.’ {Horgan, J., Profile: Fred Hoyle, Scientific American 272(3):24–25, 1995} -The Revised and Expanded Answers Book, Master Books Publ., 1990; Ch. 15


Although this picture was made independent of the very top article cited, I thought the general facts it presents fit rather well with the theme of this picture. Micron pens, Prismacolor pencils.
Related content
Comments: 21

darkriddle1 [2009-03-05 22:20:08 +0000 UTC]

There is a lot of evidence being pushed back from view, which suggests that some dinosaur and reptilian species once thought to have gone extinct in the asteroid impact did in fact, survive well into the tertiary period. They were, for example, long legged land crocodiles that feed on deer ancestors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Khylov In reply to darkriddle1 [2009-03-06 03:46:06 +0000 UTC]

Interesting. By 'long legged', do you mean by several inches more than current crocodiles, or is it less than that? If you have a link or reference - esp. to the "mega croc eating ungulate" - feel free to pass it this way; much appreciated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkriddle1 In reply to Khylov [2009-03-06 19:44:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, there were two versions of literally long-legged (by this I mean, legs tucked well under the body and longer femurs) terrestrial crocs that I know of. One species was around during the time of the early dinosaurs, while the other one was after the dinos' rule, sometime in the tertiary period. I'm illustrating a book about world Chupacabras, and I'd like to get to a project afterward were I could really illustrate some of the non-dinosaur wonders of our ages. You know, animals people know far less about. This is why I am a fan of your work, too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Khylov In reply to darkriddle1 [2009-03-11 19:29:47 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like you've got a plan. Amphibians and theriodonts always make good fare for the non-dino categories.

Best of luck with the book project; sounds like it'll be a fun one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkriddle1 In reply to Khylov [2009-03-14 00:05:14 +0000 UTC]

I already did some digital sketches on the "Sabre-tooth" phenomenon. Drew up some sabre-tooth marsupials and some synapsid/therapsids, but could never figure out why any sabre-tooth carnivores exist today. What a mystery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hyper-music86 [2008-11-30 02:18:52 +0000 UTC]

I really this picture, had of been reality, the human would be finished lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Khylov In reply to hyper-music86 [2008-12-01 22:23:39 +0000 UTC]

I'm inclined to think humans would've survived, on account of their ability to swim, body fat, and surf boards.

...And dynamite. To keep the sharks away. *high fives*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hyper-music86 In reply to Khylov [2008-12-02 18:00:26 +0000 UTC]

maybe but the evolution of humans would of been alot slower, are physical shape would be alot different, mammals were small during the jurrasic, creatious(i cant spell lol) period...i dont know, q is what will overtake humans?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aslan3000 [2007-10-27 04:34:55 +0000 UTC]

wait tapirs didnt evolve untill 30 mya

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MatrixDragondavid [2007-08-03 20:16:58 +0000 UTC]

beautiful art. RUN SUCHO! FELL THE BURN! lol.
but dinosaurs in the tertiary, not as farfetched as it sounds...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tuomaskoivurinne [2004-11-21 15:55:30 +0000 UTC]

I too think the angle and colorations are very good and dynamic work! About the text, I understand the point, but still find it it most safe to keep the dinos in the Mesozoic

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

basakward [2004-02-29 22:32:23 +0000 UTC]

Simply stunning.. I especially lik the dutch angle and the excellent perspective.. It makes it look quite convincing.. More like a photograph instead of a drawing.. The rendering is jaw-dropping as always and I love the interesting overall design of all the creatures. Wonderful work, my friend!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gennady [2004-02-29 09:04:04 +0000 UTC]

Your deviart art gallery is far more informative and appealing than any dinosaur special ive seen on the discovery channel to date. Shame on you discovery channel. Go hire khylov as your new... ummm discovery channel person in charge... guy...

Highly impressive work as always.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

andrea-koupal [2004-02-28 17:37:13 +0000 UTC]

Really interesting piece. I especially like the designs of the smaller animals running away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darkjoka119 [2004-02-28 04:34:07 +0000 UTC]

I love the tidal wave. perhaps larger splash comin from the big guy in the back would have emphasized on his " Biggness."


Beautiful colors on the dinos.

Lots of info also. Thankee Sai.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gojiboy [2004-02-27 02:30:32 +0000 UTC]

increadable work. but isnt that animal in the bottom right corner from the triasic period? or did you do that on purpose?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Khylov In reply to Gojiboy [2004-02-27 05:09:55 +0000 UTC]

I think if you read through the descriptions below the pic, that'll explain why I think the uniformitarian designations of Triassic and such are, well, unsound, to say the least Hence, yes, the adding in of animals that are deemed by evolutionists as " chronologically distinct" together in a simultaneous burying of a liquid medium. Sorting of large bodies burried in unconsolidated sediments during a MASSIVE catastrophe over days and months is what needs to be kept in mind here.

There were some other articles concerning rapid stratification that I wanted to add to the descriptions, as well as tech journals dealing with the assumptive (and ultimately flawed) interpretations regarding radiometric dating and the like. All of this adds up to one thing: Millions of dead things in the ground testify more readily to one massive catastrophe burying (and thus preserving) chronologically contemporaneous ecological niches and animals over an extended period of days and months, as opposed to millions of years of gradualism doing the job. There it is in a nutshell; layers of rock do not (and in no reasonable way could verify) epochs of millions of years. Stratomorphic sequencing (as they call it) is touted to be able to separate organisms that are presummed to have lived millions of years apart from eachother. But as closer examination takes aim to test this hypothesis, it is proving (and has actually been proven time and again) to continually falsify evolutionary presumptions:

[link]

[link]

[link]

[link]

[link]

(You'll need Adobe Acrobat to read these next two articles)

[link]

[link]

[link]

[link]

Hope these articles spark some interest in the subject (as they have for me). Thanks again for the interest, questions, and kind words!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alyn [2004-02-26 21:46:17 +0000 UTC]

wow, superb work on that large dinosaur predator, excellent

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fatally [2004-02-26 21:27:45 +0000 UTC]

i love your dinosauria art and information ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheGlome [2004-02-26 19:19:38 +0000 UTC]

Very nice work.. and what was that stuff about the K/T boundary? I have a bit of paloentologically-related knowledge myself but all of that went over my head.. stupid me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darthhorus [2004-02-26 19:02:21 +0000 UTC]

This is very beautiful work. I'm very impressed and jealous. I can't pick a single thing wrong with it.

Bravo bravo bravo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0