HOME | DD

SamBlob — 1969 was a very good year

Published: 2008-06-27 02:52:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 594; Favourites: 3; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description If anyone were to ask me when I thought the greatest era of motor racing was, I would probably have to give my apologies to Ray Harroun, Tazio Nuvolari, Juan Manuel Fangio, Billy Vukovich, Jim Clark, Alain Prost, Nigel Mansell and Tom Kristensen, and say that the greatest era of motor racing was between 1969 and 1971. This is largely because of the two cars seen here.

On the right we have the 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona, which was just about the pinnacle of factory racing cars from the Big Three. The street version had 375 hp with the standard 440 cubic inch engine and (at least) 425 hp with the optional 426 Hemi engine. The racing version lapped Talladega at 200 mph in March 1970 with Buddy Baker at the wheel. It was probably one of the most unbelievable cars that someone could buy and drive on the street.

...and, of these two cars, it is the tame one!

Apart from two of them that had been extensively modified by very wealthy owners, one could *not* drive the Porsche 917 on the street, despite it meeting the 1969-71 sports racing rules as a "production car". All that meant was that Porsche had made at least 25 of them. The engine had much less displacement than the Daytona's Hemi (5 litres against the 7.2 litre Hemi) but it was an all-out racing engine with twelve cylinders and double overhead camshafts. As a result, the 917's engine made 630 hp, dwarfing the Hemi's official 425 hp output and, it is believed, rather close to the Hemi's real power output. However, the 917's power only had to push about 800 kg plus fuel and driver, while the Daytona without fuel or driver weighed about 1700 kg, more than twice that of the purpose-built race car. This propelled the shorter, lighter, and possibly lower-drag car to speeds of 220 mph, rather faster than the astoundingly fast 200 mph Daytona.

However, there is something a bit wrong with the picture. The 917 shown is not a 1969 car. Neither the short-tail 917K version nor the partnership with John Wyer's Gulf Racing team were in place until 1970, so the Gulf-Porsche 917K shown here wouldn't have been around in 1969. The Gulf colours are the most famous 917 livery, though, and the 917K, although slower than the LH, was the version that won in 1970 and 1971.

The ultimate version of the 917 was the 917-30. With displacement increased to 5.4 L and with a pair of turbochargers pumping even more air in, it made about 1100 hp in racing trim with about 1500 hp or more available for qualifying. This was done for Can-Am racing, and mostly for Mark Donohue; I'm not sure anyone else ever raced the 917-30.

If you got through this boring lecture, then !
Related content
Comments: 19

trainoflegos [2010-03-05 05:05:53 +0000 UTC]

the 1969 charger daytona rules wish i could see one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to trainoflegos [2010-03-06 00:37:47 +0000 UTC]

Me too; all I've seen of them are photos or video clips.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainoflegos In reply to SamBlob [2010-03-06 00:44:16 +0000 UTC]

same here and one video game

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chriz00 [2008-07-21 07:54:44 +0000 UTC]

Hah, very cartoony.

I did a research report on 1969 and had a topic on the Gulf Ford GT...the final race for the car.

Quiet Amazing though, the year.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to chriz00 [2008-07-21 14:27:14 +0000 UTC]

I suppose so. Thanks!

...and then the next year Gulf Racing switched to the Porsche 917.

I'm sure other teams raced GT40s in the early '70s, though. Unless I'm mistaken, they would still have been eligible with five litre engines under the Production rules.

Indeed. A truly amazing year. Unfortunately, I wasn't born until '71.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mewberries [2008-07-03 06:36:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh, wow! This is very nicely done! The details are just amazing! I think my favorite car is the Porsche, but they both look lovely! Great job! ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to Mewberries [2008-07-10 13:32:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! Looking at all those pictures must have paid off!

I guess it's your favourite of the two, because I get the feeling your favourite racing car is smaller than either of them, is white with a red stripe and a blue stripe, and races with the number 53...

Thanks again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mewberries In reply to SamBlob [2008-07-11 05:28:46 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

Too true. That describes my favorite racing car to a T...or rather, an H.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to Mewberries [2008-07-11 13:28:33 +0000 UTC]



👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SofieWikstromArt [2008-06-30 12:31:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm really amazed over how quickly you are getting the hang of drawing cars ^^ It just keeps on getting better and better Awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to SofieWikstromArt [2008-06-30 16:25:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, sensei.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

focallength [2008-06-28 13:29:03 +0000 UTC]

That it was. We used to see the occasional Daytona (along with Superbirds and others) go past my elementary school on a daily basis. I was in 5th and 6th grade from 1969-1971.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to focallength [2008-07-04 13:12:33 +0000 UTC]

That must have been cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to SamBlob [2008-07-04 13:29:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh, it was. My cousins and neighbors were all car nuts so I learned early on what was what.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Car-Gallery [2008-06-27 11:07:22 +0000 UTC]

It really was.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to The-Car-Gallery [2008-06-27 18:05:33 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

426maxwedgie [2008-06-27 04:41:33 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you. Nascar's coolness peaked at the same time of the muscle cars' climax (1969-1970). But personally, I think the 1930s were amazing for racing era-wise. The German cars were pushing the boundaries to amazing levels.

Excellent pic, btw.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SamBlob In reply to 426maxwedgie [2008-07-05 15:51:59 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps; they gave the world swing-axle independent suspension and mid-engined racing cars (although they didn't quite recognize the advantage of the mid-engine layout; the British would make better use of the phenomenon in the '50s and '60s). I'm not sure to what extent the use of nitromethane/acetone fuel mixtures was an advance, though; they gave massive power at the cost of turning the car into a rolling bomb...

The mid-engine revolution of the '50s and '60s and the '80s phenomena of Group B in sports car racing and the turbo era in Formula One might make good cases for being great eras in racing, but the Daytona had a NASCAR speed record that took well over a decade to break and the 917K has a Le Mans distance record that will never be broken as long as there are chicanes on the Mulsanne straight.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

426maxwedgie In reply to SamBlob [2008-07-12 01:00:10 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure about the rolling bomb thing. I don't remember reading about many explosions. But I'm not doubting that that happened on occasion. But they did poison the drivers, take Nuvolari for example.

Group B in rally cars was also amazing. But you do make a good case for yourself here.

But the reality is it's a matter of personal preference - what do you like the most.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0