HOME | DD
Published: 2011-03-17 23:14:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4497; Favourites: 80; Downloads: 22
Redirect to original
Description
I think about falling in math class.The boy in front of me is writing diligently, noting each and every word as though he forgot it was all in the textbook. He has dark hair all tangled up in the back like a bramble of thornbushes and his green hoodie looks like it could use a good washing.
The professor is rattling on about asymptotes, about two lines that go on forever, getting closer and closer but never touching. He tells us about the Greek roots of the word; asymptotos, that it means "not falling together," and he scribbles nonsense equations on the board and hopes that we understand them better than he does because tenure is the only reason he's teaching this class.
As much as I hate math, I have to admit there's something beautiful about the concept. Something romantic and longing, something I can relate to in a sea of cold precision and dispassionate numbers.
I think about falling in math class. I think about fractals and their intricate patterns, turning equations into art. The way the numbers fall in on themselves in an infinite recursion and coil into tiny self-similar spirals that spawn their own iteration over and over and over again.
The girl next to me looks bored, head resting heavily on hand, occasionally snapping her gum and flipping long blonde hair with an obnoxious sigh as though the look on her face weren't enough evidence of her complete disinterest. I'm writing numbers and doodling curves on blank graph paper; the curves become a heart.
I'm falling behind in math class. I'm running in spirals that corkscrew around the y-axis of a z-plane full of random integers and imaginary numbers, where eight is indifferent from infinity. There's a ratio, a correlation, some unknown relationship between myself and these digits that keeps calling me back to that which I don't understand. That finds unspeakable beauty in mysteries. Mathematics is my asymptote.
I'm failing math class, but it's never been a more elegant fall.
Related content
Comments: 90
SilverInkblot In reply to ??? [2015-08-15 22:45:17 +0000 UTC]
Thank you I'm still quite happy with this little piece, even four years later.
π: 0 β©: 0
PaperDart [2015-06-11 14:56:33 +0000 UTC]
Lauren, you consistently make me want to write bad poetry about maths. I think that's my response to the too-short question as well -- this piece is beautiful and holds itself together well in its three hundred words, but it doesn't nearly exhaust the topic. From my point of view the terminology worked well and made sense. I saw one person comment that the title doesn't entirely make mathematical sense, but I think it's close enough to work in context. "spirals that corkscrew around the y-axis of a z-plane full of random integers and imaginary numbers, where eight is indifferent from infinity" is probably not something that can be entirely reconciled with high school math class, but I have seen quantum field theorists do much weirder things and it didn't jar my mathematician side. (It was my favourite line of the piece, in fact.) Part of that is maybe because there's no claim to be writing as an expert, just as somebody who thinks the concepts are beautiful and is struggling to make them behave (which I daresay is what all mathematicians are, at some level).
That perspective was kind of fascinating as someone who uses a fair bit of weird maths day in and day out. "a sea of cold precision and dispassionate numbers" caught me off guard. I can see where that opinion would come from, but it's almost alien to me and the insight into how maths looks from 'the other side' so to speak is fascinating. I want to say something like "Maths isn't precise -- engineering is precise -- maths is exact, which is far more beautiful" But I don't think a sentence can nearly capture the perspective shift (and of course that would be a terribly biased thing to say ) I love the fact that you manage to bring that perspective difference out and contrast the beautiful stuff with the frustrating school-math thing that people are so often subjected to.
I wondered if you are/were at the time of writing familiar with Vi Hart's doodling in math class videos . If not, I think you might like them!
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to PaperDart [2015-06-12 01:30:58 +0000 UTC]
You should write bad poetry about maths then
I've always liked stuff like fractals, even if I don't really understand the higher mathematics behind them. I just think they look cool And my fascination with spirals has stuck with me since, like, forever.
I've never seen that video series, so thank you for introducing me! I just watched the binary trees and will have to check out the rest now
π: 0 β©: 1
PaperDart In reply to SilverInkblot [2015-06-14 11:56:57 +0000 UTC]
Maybe I will.
We put too much emphasis on the higher maths, in my not-so-humble opinion. The fact that there are shapes with repeating patterns and they're awesome is the essence of fractals. There's a question of what it actually means to repeat forever (how long is the line around the edge of a fractal that does that?) and then there's a whole lot of work that goes into asking that precisely enough to be able to say that the line goes on forever in a precise kind of way. You get ninety percent of the awesome for one percent of the effort. It's useful for some of us to want make it all more precise than that, but generally that's all you get: more precision.
π: 0 β©: 0
LovablyAwkward [2015-04-19 20:10:03 +0000 UTC]
You summed up my relationship with math perfectly.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to LovablyAwkward [2015-04-19 20:23:59 +0000 UTC]
Glad to be of service
π: 0 β©: 1
LovablyAwkward In reply to SilverInkblot [2015-04-19 20:24:52 +0000 UTC]
You're amazing!Β
π: 0 β©: 0
SilverInkblot In reply to hopeburnsblue [2014-04-29 00:15:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks This one is still one of my faves.
π: 0 β©: 0
DoctorKeys [2014-04-26 21:02:52 +0000 UTC]
What makes this good is the high velocity at which it flows. I love your return to the theme, and the stanza-style form you have here. It reminds me very much of music and I love it.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to DoctorKeys [2014-04-28 03:30:59 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Even after all this time, it's still one of my personal favorite pieces.
π: 0 β©: 0
BlackBowfin In reply to BlackBowfin [2014-03-22 21:59:02 +0000 UTC]
I love math/science in art-Β you linkedΒ themΒ marvelously.
π: 0 β©: 0
gossamerdissonance [2014-02-28 06:03:56 +0000 UTC]
This is so genius and amazing an relatable. I can't even think of anything to say to express how much I love it.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to gossamerdissonance [2014-03-01 02:42:44 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Also, your username is cool
π: 0 β©: 0
DeriveAnemone [2014-01-26 17:56:40 +0000 UTC]
My friends never got how I found asymptotes so sad. This, for me, sums up the hidden beauty that is written in cold, hard numbers and figures so well.Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to DeriveAnemone [2014-01-26 18:23:09 +0000 UTC]
Thank you I find things like fractals and recursion fascinating, even if I don't understand the higher math concepts behind them. But that's probably part of the intrigue.
π: 0 β©: 0
KyaniteArcher [2013-09-27 11:50:52 +0000 UTC]
Everything made sense- I found that the maths terms (many of which I don't understand) add to the prosetry-like feel of this piece, and adds a sense of falling especially in the last few paragraphs- I guess this is what you were aiming for.
I think it might be a little too short. A new scene shouldn't be needed but if you could add more to the existing, uh, stuff, then the "I think about..." paragraphs wouldn't seem as repetitive.
π: 0 β©: 0
LeftUnfinished [2013-09-24 19:44:58 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! A lot like a poem I wrote about math. Check it out? That would mean a lot.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to LeftUnfinished [2013-09-24 19:46:47 +0000 UTC]
Sure - do you have a link?
π: 0 β©: 0
SilverInkblot In reply to camelopardalisinblue [2013-05-28 03:36:28 +0000 UTC]
Thank you
π: 0 β©: 1
camelopardalisinblue In reply to SilverInkblot [2013-05-28 03:53:31 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome!
π: 0 β©: 0
SnowmenLikeToWrite [2012-02-20 04:40:04 +0000 UTC]
"The earth turned to bring us closer, it spun on itself and within us, and finally joined us together in this dream." Eugenio Montejo
I have this quote up on my DA page, it has a relation to mathematical theory, how two people come to meet through a series of seemingly random events, a cosmic serendipity so to speak.
There is no coincidence, only synchronicity.
I am a student of art, but I also have a curious interest in math that admittdely starts and ends with the broader applications, once I start getting into dividing fractions and correlating algorithms and so forth I start to lose track.
Love this piece, very reflective and playful.
Well done, the observations of other students and the way you used math as a means to conveying abstract emotions was a nice touch also, especially in light of it's foreign nature and your failing the class.
Quite lovely.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to SnowmenLikeToWrite [2012-02-20 05:15:52 +0000 UTC]
Synchonicity is a fantastic word I should use the concept for a piece sometime.
I enjoy the combination of math and art as well - I really enjoy the juxtaposition of the rational and the emotional. I think it's fascinating.
I have to make myself feel better about constantly failing Algebra somehow Thank you for the fave!
π: 0 β©: 1
SnowmenLikeToWrite In reply to SilverInkblot [2012-02-20 05:24:15 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely, a fine work it would be.
Carl Jung popularized that the theory of synchronicity, he was a psychologist that worked closely with Sigmund Freud, it was fresh in my mind since I'd just seen the movie A Dangerous Method based on the book "The Talking Cure", about their collaboration and eventual falling out.
Love your work! Cheers.
π: 0 β©: 0
RosesWritten [2011-10-01 03:53:56 +0000 UTC]
I believe that this is absolutely gorgeous!
It makes perfect sense! I can totally see how it can be romantic and the way you relate it to algebra is just amazing!
Total fave!
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to RosesWritten [2011-10-01 04:06:30 +0000 UTC]
Thank you This has become one of my favorite pieces
I'm glad you like it as well.
Thanks for the fave!
π: 0 β©: 1
RosesWritten In reply to SilverInkblot [2011-10-01 17:16:01 +0000 UTC]
It is one of my fave pieces here on dA too
It's my pleasure to be able to fave and comment on beautiful pieces like these!
π: 0 β©: 0
kakashiplushie [2011-07-04 15:40:02 +0000 UTC]
I love this. I love that you made math almost musical.
I'm running in spirals that corkscrew around the y-axis of a z-plane full of random integers and imaginary numbers, where eight is indifferent from infinity. I'm not sure what that means but at this point, I felt like I was listening more than reading or comprehending. The flow is beautiful.
As someone who gave up on math--quite literally, I started out as a Math major and now I'm not really sure where I'm going as long as it has nothing to do with the sciences--this just made me remember why I liked it in the first place.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to kakashiplushie [2011-07-04 18:50:41 +0000 UTC]
Thank you I'm happy that both sides of the coin can relate to this - the people that hate/don't get math, and the people who love and understand it. I think that's an interesting result
Thanks for the fave!
π: 0 β©: 0
a-nameless-one [2011-06-15 07:46:52 +0000 UTC]
The piece is beautiful, and your command of the English language is admirable, as is the flow of your metaphors.
The use of most mathematical terms is correct, and you are able to draw from them evocative expressions of emotion.
On a technical note, there are two things that do not make sense mathematically:
(1) "I'm running in spirals that corkscrew around the y-axis of a z-plane full of random integers and imaginary numbers" - I do not wish to bother with technical details, but imaginary planes come only in even dimensions, so while a spiral is possible a corkscrew is not (unless it only one imaginary plane line, which is quite uncommon like (sin(x),icos(y),z)).
(2)"Tangential Asymptotes" - Tangents have by definition a point of contact, you can view this paradoxical title as an extension of your theme about asymptotic properties throughout the piece, or you can alternatively explain this by saying that two asymptotic lines converge at the point of infinity.
π: 0 β©: 2
SilverInkblot In reply to a-nameless-one [2011-06-17 01:22:44 +0000 UTC]
I think I was more confused by the term "even dimensions" than anything. Can you explain that one? Is it different from "odd dimensions?" o_O
I am concerned with accuracy, but only to a certain extent - if it's going to ruin the atmosphere or the plot, then I'm willing to let a few things slide. For the most part though, I aim to integrate the rational and emotional in pieces like this as best I can, and I believe that means being as accurate as I can. In this particular case, I think I'm willing to leave things alone rather than ruin the ambiance.
Really glad you liked it, despite any technical errors
π: 0 β©: 1
a-nameless-one In reply to SilverInkblot [2011-06-17 06:32:31 +0000 UTC]
The number of dimensions is reflected by the amount of coordinates necessary in order to describe a point or a vector. We can visualize a up to three dimensions: 1 being a line, two being a plane, and three being a space. But conceptually, we can describe an object with any number of dimensions. The ability to draw/visualize it is not important. For example, in Albert Einstein's theory of relativity space-time is described by four dimensions (three relating to space, and one to time).
The complex plane is a two dimensional object composed of two perpendicular lines one we call the 'Real line' and the other is called the 'Imaginary line'. Thus, every point on the complex plane is denoted by two coordinates (one real and the other imaginary). If we wanted to describe the location of a point composed of two complex point we would need four coordinates or dimensions, hence my remark about the apparent parity of complex dimensions.
Upon some further observation, I realized that I was in error in the first place. In Einsteins relativity theory the time dimension is in fact 'imaginary'. In order to create such a space you need a Minkowski metric (blah, blah, blah...) which is not something used commonly in math, but is used in physics.
So I feel a bit dumb and you are thoroughly vindicated.
Sorry about that.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to a-nameless-one [2011-06-17 16:33:31 +0000 UTC]
Looks like you're building up to this: [link] which just leads off in a completely different direction Though I do intend to write a similarly toned-piece using quantum mechanics as the theme, so perhaps I should get that video bookmarked.
π: 0 β©: 1
a-nameless-one In reply to SilverInkblot [2011-06-17 21:05:33 +0000 UTC]
The clip is actually about string theory and not QM, but it does give a pretty interesting intuition about high-order dimensions.
Personally, I'm not a big believer in string theory.
Anyway, you might want to read a bit in wikipedia about QM beforehand, because it has many concepts that are interpreted too literally by people unfamiliar with the field (like 'observer dependent' which does not refer to a conscious observer, it actually refers to any measuring instrument according to most interpretations).
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to a-nameless-one [2011-06-17 21:09:16 +0000 UTC]
I don't enough about any of it to believe in anything, but it's interesting to me nonetheless. Which was what the piece was about in the first place I suppose
π: 0 β©: 0
SilverInkblot In reply to a-nameless-one [2011-06-15 18:42:06 +0000 UTC]
"...imaginary planes come only in even dimensions..."
I honestly don't even know what that means. I'm afraid your first note has gone right over my head I assumed at least some of my use of terminology would be wrong though, so I do appreciate being corrected. That particular paragraph was supposed to function as imagery/metaphor for getting lost in math. I was hoping to evoke something similar to that old Donald Duck cartoon where he gets lost in Math Land if that makes sense?
I did want the title to be a paradox - I liked it too much to waste the wordplay, and I couldn't figure out a way to integrate it into the text somehow. I thought it went well with the idea of both being able to just barely understand something, and yet it's still very far beyond your reach.
All the same, I'm glad you still liked it enough to favorite
π: 0 β©: 1
a-nameless-one In reply to SilverInkblot [2011-06-17 00:47:28 +0000 UTC]
First of all, I apologize I meant suppose to say complex planes not imaginary.
I'm a math major, and you asked if the use of your terminology was correct. I don't wish to bother you with mathematical details, suffice to say that imaginary numbers aren't really 'imaginary'. The word is used because they are not part of the set of numbers known as the 'Real line'.
It is perhaps the most commonly abused mathematical term in art.
You shouldn't really be bothered by it because for most readers it will be translucent, unless you're really concerned about technical accuracy.
It is indeed a good title that expresses the idea you wish to convey.
Aside from being at times a bit pedantic mathematically, I very much enjoy your style of writing which I find to have a very natural, lyrical and seamless flow which I am quite envious of.
π: 0 β©: 0
nyogu [2011-05-11 14:35:16 +0000 UTC]
I love math, I think it's always beautiful, clean and crisp and flawless. (like new snow, if I were being particularly flowery today). This is beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to nyogu [2011-05-11 16:35:38 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Glad you liked it!
Thanks for the fave
π: 0 β©: 1
nyogu In reply to SilverInkblot [2011-05-12 14:02:12 +0000 UTC]
Sure, I enjoyed it a lot. ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
lonealphawolf [2011-05-09 01:16:06 +0000 UTC]
This is why you deserve the feature!
The title is beautiful but so are the rest. I understood mostly everything except 'asymptotes' but you briefly explained (and I also google searched it) so yeah! You've brought elegance and beauty into Mathematics and you actually make me believe so (as much as I hate Math
). Also, there's nothing wrong with the length; I like it just the way it is.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to lonealphawolf [2011-05-09 01:25:37 +0000 UTC]
Thank you kindly for the recommendation
This has become one of my favorite pieces. I was really surprised that something about math has gotten such a positve reception on an art site Didn't see that coming.
Thanks for the fave!
π: 0 β©: 1
lonealphawolf In reply to SilverInkblot [2011-05-09 01:55:51 +0000 UTC]
It was my pleasure! Of course; this was lovely! You made me love Math for a second there.
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to lonealphawolf [2011-05-09 01:57:35 +0000 UTC]
That's the best compliment
π: 0 β©: 1
Solarune [2011-04-04 19:59:02 +0000 UTC]
As much as I hate math, I have to admit there's something beautiful about the concept. Something romantic and longing, something I can relate to in a sea of cold precision and dispassionate numbers.
I love this; I can really relate to it. Your writing is so precise and elegant; I think the piece makes sense, and I'm no maths guru, but the terms didn't confuse me, even the ones I didn't understand. They added a sense of authenticity to it, definitely improved it rather than taking anything away. I really enjoyed the extended metaphor/idea of falling winds its way through the piece.
I don't think it was too short β it seemed just the perfect length to me.
Beautiful work
π: 0 β©: 1
SilverInkblot In reply to Solarune [2011-04-04 22:28:15 +0000 UTC]
I'm no math guru either But that kinda made it fun to write
I'm really glad this has been so well received on all fronts. I was a little nervous that the terminology would overpower the emotional content.
Thank you for an encouraging review
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>