HOME | DD
EmilyStepp — The Land Before Time - Chomper and Parents
#chomper #dinosaurs #tyrannosaurusrex #thelandbeforetimechomper #thelandbeforetimerealistic
Published: 2015-08-21 23:02:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 33984; Favourites: 497; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description
Chomper and his parents out for a hunt.Alternative style and made to somewhat match another piece I did - fav.me/d876ywy
Related content
Comments: 79
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I Love ChomperHaving Purple Feathers and The Adults of Rough Scalley Skin[I Dont Like The Featers on The Arms Honestly] Good JobMy Pal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I probably wouldn't keep the arm feathers as full and wing-like if I were to redo this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
“Friends for dinner , Im gonna have friends for dinner “
Love those realistic Sharpteeth you Made there 😁
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
I'm sure he'll molt one day and look more like his parents. Birds often change colors as they age.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Or it could be a mail man situation-
Chomper's Father: Why is our son-?
A pinkish purple T-Rex smirks from the distance.
Chomper's Father's eyes narrow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's actually my favorite theory so far. Damn.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
it always confused me how a Brass coloured T.Rex + a Black T.rex = a Purple T.Rex
still this looks super cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's just the way nature works sometimes. Look at these mallards for instance images.fineartamerica.com/imag… If going by real life logic Chomper should grow to have the same color as his father.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh look, the dad's smiling for the camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i guess that makes sense
but they have that pattern to help them hide from larger predators while chomper was purple
i guess it is just a style choice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cartoon logic. In real life a purple coat would stick out like a sore thumb.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I thought his dad was green like the male Rex in The Lost World: Jurassic Park.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it's kindof a muted brown green in The Land Before Time 2, depending on the lighting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I thought chomper was a trex but in this he looks like a velociraptor, I still love the pic though
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tyrannosaur juveniles went through some pretty extreme changes as they grew.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chomper is love chomper is life #teamsharptooth Ya I just made that a thing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Awesome picture, so I remember watching this movie since when I was a little kid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And Chompers folks look a lot more threatening now, I never could view them as scary with those silly, outdated kangaroo postures from the movies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
because he's a juvenile tyrannosaur 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because tyrannosaurs were likely covered in feathers - especially the young.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh no, don't start on that theory again!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Please stop it since you obviously don't know what your talking about,like it or not that theory is now a proven fact and accepted by everyone in the scientific community.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You first. Not every scientist accepts this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You don't have to accept it, but it's what the scientific community is leaning toward now. It's fine if you like unscientific outdated representations, but it doesn't mean I have to draw them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Unscientific? There were never any feathers found on the skeleton of a tyrannosaurus so it seems to me that the previous conclusion is more scientific.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
take a look at this if you want the reason why that was sometimes the case orig09.deviantart.net/651a/f/2…
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
There was no fossil evidence to support the fact that tyrannosaurus had feathers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Really? Ever heard of Yutyrannus and Dilong dumdum.Both have plenty of evidence of having been covered in feathers,both are tyrannosaurs and the later is the ancestor of all American tyrannosaurs including T.Rex.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, there were no feathers found on the tyrannosaurus. That's balderdash. And where are the fossils linking every transitional species from that bird to the Tyrant Lizard King?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, they will never find them. Every keeps saying 'not yet' for the last 150 years and no fossils of proof for evolution have been found what-so-ever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
with palaeontology: -Never say never!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
And you say that when you claim you will never find human and dinosaur fossils mingled together.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that is a bit different I meant in terms of the body covering or internal anatomy,and I simply meant be a bit open minded
because there have been many discoveries suggesting that not only raptor or tyrannosaurs had feathers
but also dinosaurs like-
Therizinosaurs-massive peaceful herbivore with giant fore-claws that are surprisingly are a close relative of tyrannosaurs
Orinthomimmids- Ostrich like dinosaurs that run up to speeds of 70 kph
Covecaveonator- allosaur theropod with strange dorsal fin and covered quills, especially the arms
Kulindadromeus- An ornithopod from the triassic period with a scaly tail, but it's body is completely covered in downy fluff
Pegomastax- An Ornithopod from Triassic Africa with tusks and covered in porcupine like quills (protofeathers)
psittacosaurus- ancestor of triceratops from middle Cretaceous, with undeniable evidence of bristly porto-feathers covering the tail
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Open minded? It's more like wildly assumptive. And just the assumption that an ostrich runs that fast claiming that the dinosaurs are related is the fallacy of assumption, considering that the cheetah can run that fast. No, quills are not the same as proto-featheres and something like that would more than likely have served as a defense mechanism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
also if all your gonna do is disagree with evidence (without good evidence of your own), Then you might as well be considered a "David Peters"
I mean, look at his what he thinks of pterosaurs
1-Rhamphorynchus
His version- nemo-ramjet.deviantart.com/art…
Proper version (based on proper fossil evidence)-alternateprehistory.deviantart…
2-Pteranodon
His version- nemo-ramjet.deviantart.com/art…
Proper version (based on proper fossil evidence)- tuomaskoivurinne.deviantart.co…
And even when evidence and professional paelotogists show him evidence he just turns them down and refuses to accept new evidence
Please don't be like him...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Their ancestors had feathers, therefore due to phylogenetic bracketing - we can assume they were also feathered. www.wired.com/2012/04/yutyrann…
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
take a look at this if you want the reason why that was sometimes the case orig09.deviantart.net/651a/f/2…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Look, just because one animal, even if it was the tyrannosaurus ancestor, had feathers it doesn't mean that tyrannosaurs itself did. There needs to be fossil evidence on tyrannosaurus itself had those feathers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
| Next =>