HOME | DD

jbobroony β€” Alturnative Discovery Comparison Chart

#battle #binary #chart #clarke #class #comparison #constitution #dana #dead #discovery #earthart #edison #engle #enterprise #europa #federation #fleet #hath #hoover #kerala #klingon #magee #ride #sharn #ship #ships #sioux #star #trek #walker #yeager #malachowski #shenzou #crossfieldclass
Published: 2018-11-05 18:25:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 14163; Favourites: 133; Downloads: 340
Redirect to original
Description What could have been
Related content
Comments: 81

jbobroony In reply to ??? [2024-02-18 12:39:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DonDonP1 In reply to jbobroony [2024-02-18 23:24:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jnadreth [2023-12-03 09:09:48 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to jnadreth [2023-12-03 12:44:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Maphisto86 [2023-10-23 18:34:47 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 3

jbobroony In reply to Maphisto86 [2024-02-18 12:43:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DonDonP1 In reply to Maphisto86 [2024-02-17 22:05:02 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jbobroony In reply to Maphisto86 [2023-10-23 20:54:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

DonDonP1 In reply to jbobroony [2024-02-17 22:06:43 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Voltron64 [2022-09-13 18:13:24 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Voltron64 [2022-09-13 18:23:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

PalClem1112Ill [2021-08-29 19:27:48 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to PalClem1112Ill [2021-08-29 20:13:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sndjsj393818388 [2021-04-26 14:38:20 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

randomentity777 [2020-10-18 01:22:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to randomentity777 [2020-10-18 08:29:37 +0000 UTC]

Its a shame, they look so nice and show how much you can still do with the design.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Colourbrand [2020-07-06 17:51:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Colourbrand [2020-07-13 08:39:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you mate, it appreciated πŸ‘

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theincredibleg [2020-05-07 03:26:20 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to theincredibleg [2020-05-08 10:33:11 +0000 UTC]

Now that would be cool and thank you again for your kind words mate.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

theincredibleg In reply to jbobroony [2020-05-18 10:21:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to theincredibleg [2020-05-18 13:20:15 +0000 UTC]

Lol, cheer mate. I think another of the ship in online can do with a better paint job. Although some of them look cool, I like all the orbital shuttle paint jobs πŸ‘Œ

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

0502matt [2020-02-13 18:24:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to 0502matt [2020-02-13 20:49:11 +0000 UTC]

Yes I thought so to, shame we never saw them like this. Would have been nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GearChronicleFan [2019-12-22 07:25:49 +0000 UTC]

Well, you've definitely made a good effort here with these designs I think. Personally I would've redesigned the whole lot (leaving the Connie alone of course), change certain elements on each one, like I'd move the bridge module on the Walker class to the top of the saucer, because that never made sense to me, and I'd completely redo the saucer of the Cardenas class too. But like I say, you've made a good effort to make them look more fitting into the original design style, it looks way better than what CBS put out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to GearChronicleFan [2019-12-22 10:40:16 +0000 UTC]

With CBS saying all Star Trek stuff belongs to them I am surprised they didn't just take other people's design and save time.
I still don't know why they did blocky engines and yup, the bridge is definitely on the wrong side of things.
The sizes as well, I mean I have made they smaller.
But in the show, some of these ship are bigger than the Enterprise D!
If you put the Enterprise from Discovery next to the original series and JJ's version, it's closer to JJ's.
It's massive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GearChronicleFan In reply to jbobroony [2019-12-22 14:32:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, funny how they steal things from people who have nothing to do with Star Trek, but when it comes to things that actually matter to proper Star Trek fans they just turn a blind eye...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to GearChronicleFan [2019-12-22 20:19:26 +0000 UTC]

With you their mate, Axanar are thiefs but Egyptian video game plot is in the the first series of Discovery and thats perfectly fine... Just coincidence lol
But if you have millions behind you, who can touch you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GearChronicleFan In reply to jbobroony [2019-12-22 21:12:01 +0000 UTC]

maybe with the CBS Viacom merger now complete Redstone might be able to make changes to how things are done in the future. According to Midnight's Edge, she's apparently not pleased in the least at how Moonves had Trek changed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to GearChronicleFan [2019-12-24 09:24:04 +0000 UTC]

That sounds like good news, hopefully things will change for the better. Look how happy Star Wars fans are! .... Well with the freedom anyway lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GearChronicleFan In reply to jbobroony [2019-12-24 13:21:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure we can safely say that's the case. Not just yet, anyway... Considering there's apparently a lot of backlash to TROS, lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to GearChronicleFan [2019-12-26 11:29:26 +0000 UTC]

Well here's hoping for the best anyway. It can not get any worse lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GearChronicleFan In reply to jbobroony [2019-12-26 11:36:36 +0000 UTC]

XD I wouldn't say that just yet, lol. We'll just have to wait and see, I suppose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Emilion-3 [2019-10-10 16:16:04 +0000 UTC]

This looks much better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Emilion-3 [2019-10-12 18:55:14 +0000 UTC]

Cheers mate, I don't see how these ships would not fit into the story perfectly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Emilion-3 In reply to jbobroony [2019-10-12 19:19:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. Its the look of them. The current designs look like something from post Dominion war Era.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Emilion-3 [2019-10-12 23:23:31 +0000 UTC]

Yes, your quite right. Too angular and squared off.
There was no need to stuff things up with this nonsense.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Emilion-3 In reply to jbobroony [2019-10-13 02:33:22 +0000 UTC]

The ones you've made are excellent.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Emilion-3 [2019-10-13 18:26:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, that's kind of you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Emilion-3 In reply to jbobroony [2019-10-13 18:52:45 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome. Keep it up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stargazzer811 [2019-03-31 06:02:59 +0000 UTC]

I would say the only thing wrong here is Discovery's nacelles. They should be chopped in half length wise then mounted, otherwise this is solid work JB.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Stargazzer811 [2019-04-01 17:44:47 +0000 UTC]

I see what you mean, that is a idea I never thought of. Glad you like them thou.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stargazzer811 In reply to jbobroony [2019-04-20 00:12:46 +0000 UTC]

Well its just they are really long and shouldn't be

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ArmyForTomorrow [2019-03-18 12:29:34 +0000 UTC]

I didn't think it was possible for STD designs to be converted into true Star Trek ships. You have brilliantlyΒ proven me wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to ArmyForTomorrow [2019-03-25 17:10:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much, glad to hear (Read lol) that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SlTZKRlEG [2019-03-07 19:04:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for converting them to TOS!Β  Will you be doing the full orthos of each over time?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to SlTZKRlEG [2019-03-25 17:12:14 +0000 UTC]

slowly lol.
did aΒ malachowski class, unchanged for the star trek manual that franze Joseph did... if i spelled it right, will post it soon mate.Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MWaterhouseAuthor [2019-01-22 16:20:08 +0000 UTC]

These are brilliant

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to MWaterhouseAuthor [2019-01-27 11:24:06 +0000 UTC]

thank you, shame we never saw them in the episode.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NX-74205 [2018-11-21 23:11:17 +0000 UTC]

Excellent!


While I wouldn't postulate that all ships of the era have to look like the Constitution class, the series could look a lot more credible

- without the "angular nacelle" dictate

- with something like a recognizable ship family instead of the random/generic/anachronistic design mess of the series

- without the bridge window fad

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3


| Next =>