HOME | DD
jbobroony — Discovery Comparison Chart
#battle #binary #chart #clarke #class #comparison #constitution #dana #dead #discovery #earthart #edison #engle #enterprise #europa #federation #fleet #hath #hoover #kerala #klingon #magee #ride #sharn #ship #ships #sioux #star #trek #walker #yeager #malachowski #shenzou #crossfieldclass
Published: 2018-08-26 13:32:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 16930; Favourites: 145; Downloads: 488
Redirect to original
Description
Well here it is, not to the same scale as my other ships, but i hope you all like it any way.Related content
Comments: 66
I know, now every ship we may recognize has to be scaled up to discovery and the enterprise size. Like the D7.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
just fyi. there is a 3d artist that is currently doing a conni class but also with all the interia designs and found that the model is the correct size but the depiction of scale is wrongly
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i hate the size of the Discovery, you see them in the windows and it does a dramatic back up, its no were near 700 meter long. And just resonantly with the lifts running though massive areas of space inside the ship, useless tube that go on for miles to eject small craft.... its all just eye candy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the writers do not care about star trek yes the Constitution Class Starships are only about 290 Meters. Technology is well over 150 years more advanced. It is bull crap. the discovery is about the size of the Republic Assault Ships from the Clone Wars and Attack of the Clones.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It was gene who said the the constitution was the biggest, fastest and most powerful ship in the fleet. And then there is discovery... bigger, faster and more powerful. What a spit in the eye to the creator. In session 2, pike even prefers the discovery to the enterprise!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Discovery is star trek in name only.
it's a scab that needs to fall off
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
but the discovery is technology wat too advanced Powerful and Massive for the era more Like post 2380
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
that figure has been proven to be wrong. sugest you search up the artist GMD3d he did a connie with working interia based on and attempted to get everything to work. the ship itself did not work and was too small so he upped the size adding more detail and missing parts that was spoken about like escape pods and differnt docking ports ect ect
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
When every single Star Trek source I can find says that the original Connie is 289m long, it's 289m long!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dude I’m just saying that the TOS Enterprise is 289m long. Stop trying to say that this recreation is the one that’s canon. Sorry if I come off as condescending and rude I’m just kinda 1000% done and can’t deal with this today.
The design is still pretty cool, although I think Bill Krause’s Shangri-la class is better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Your thinking of the original series mate, everything in Discovery is bigger.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This only confirms the theory that Discovery is an alternate timeline! Although I don't understand why you kept those measurements here:
IMO, it would've been nice to have more accurate measurements, but hey, you do you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that was a mistake, i started with the other discovery chart and draw over it, it some how crept in
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Excellenet work here sir - very well done and detailed
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you so much mate, Glad you like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is awesome! I hope you keep it updated as the new "shorts" and season come out!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will try my best mate, not a lot of free time these days lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Awesome! Thank you for you time here! Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your very welcome mate, glad you like them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thank you buddy, glad you like them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the hoover class look completely different from the side view. like why are nacelles that far away from the main body.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dang man this is really cool that you have drawn the ships from Discovery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks buddy, glad you like them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hallo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
My pleasure mate, i am glad you like them. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
These look pretty good. but i hate the rescaling so much
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks, I dont like the size of the ships in discovery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Another thing that REALLY ticked me off...Since WHEN do Klingons look like they took a bath in tar?!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Lol, or got their armor from Skyrim.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
uMM...'Scuse me, but....in 2266, the Constitution Class was the largest, and most powerful, of any of the starships Starfleet had! (Technically, a cargo transport towing a score of cargo carriers would've been longer, but....!)
I don't even WATCH Discovery. The sets make the technology look a hundred years in advance of Kirk's time, and James T. Kirk is 20 years in the FUTURE of Discovery?!? The writing leaves a lot to be desired, too. Thank GOD they didn't--or COULDN'T--get Discovery on normal TV! I can't believe people actually "stream" C-Grade junk like that! I saw the FIRST episode, shook my head, and said, "No THANK YOU!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Yes, yes yes.... the Enterprise was the flag ship of the fleet, with the best tech and weapons, the biggest and the baddest. so how come the discovery has faster engines, bigger hull and better tech.
does not sit well with me, when i watch i dont see star trek, i see a parallel universes. yet another mutiverse, to add to JJ's.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lolz
We have never seen a canon version of the 2250s, when Discovery place. Also, the Enterprise IS larger than the Discovery. She is shorter than Discovery, but has bigger hulls, giving her a larger internal volume, allowing for a larger crew compliment. Length isn't everything. Furthernore, the tech level in TOS was meant to seem fantastical in 1966 - if we built the Enterprise today, it would be closer to the Enterprise-D in terms of technology. It makes no sense to show us the 23rd century by way of the 60s when we are already far beyond that level of technology. The franchise has to evolve and adapt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know what you are saying but if you watch the Axanar trailer, you can be true to trek and still be amazing.
Star Trek Enterprise managed to look old and new at the same time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, but TOS looked the way it did because the budget didn't allow for it to look better. Hence why TNG looks so much more advanced than TOS - Roddenberry was finally able to do a lot of what he wanted to in TOS, but never had the money or technology to. DISC is an opportunity, from a VFX perspective, to showcase what Roddenberry could have done with better tech and a much higher budget.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But it's not what he wanted, he said there should not be ANY internal conflict between crew, that peace should be the aim at all time and that illness and war are over come now.
ALL these rules are broke... the crew are at odds all the time, star fleet let a huge bomb but put on the Klingon home world and they were are war from the first episode.
Gene got all the money he needed and made the motion picture. No wars, no internal fighting and peace was the end game.
The next generation in the same, nothing like Discovery...
I am not saying I don't like Discovery, it just you could have put this story anywhere in time, like after Picard and it would have been just as good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There is a reason the The Motion Picture was the only Roddenberry wrote - it was dull and uninspired, much like "The Cage." It was incredibly intelligent, and, more's the pity, intelligence does not equate to box office sales - TMP was a bit of flop. TWoK, however, was a resounding success, and TVH was box office hit. Neither of these movies fit with Roddenberry's vision of Trek, yet they are considered the best of the original movies. The fact is, people do not want Roddenberry's original vision of Trek, because utopia is boring and unbelievable. DS9 proved that quite handily, and Enterprise's 3rd season was some of the best writing in Trek until "In a Mirror Darkly." On the topic of rules, he broke his own rules countless times. "The Balance of Terror," "The Doomsday Machine," "Court Martial," "Mirror, Mirror," et al. He had countless interpersonal conflicts and war analogies. He even pitched Trek as Horatio Hornblower in space. Additionally, TNG is almost exactly the same as DISC, in that most fans were practically rioting over it. Many detractors believed it was not Trek simply because it was not going to feature the original cast. Even after airing, TNG was plagued with issues, and really only took off after Roddenberry's death around Season 3. If we are perfectly honest and objective, Trek has enjoyed its best movies, series, and indivudual episodes when Roddenberry either wasn't writing (TWoK, DS9) or was throwing utopia right out the window ("Balance of Terror," "The Enterprise Incident"). Roddenberry is dead, and while Star Trek may live on, it needs to grow and evolve, lest it get left in the dust by far less campy franchises. Each generation has played a role in the growth of series, and we as fans should be thrilled to see our favorite show back for more. Ratings wise, DISC has been a resounding success, so much so that Patrick Stewart will be reprising his role as Captain Picard in another new series. Ever since Enterprise was unceremoniously cancelled, fans have been pining for a new series, yet when one is announced, it gets attacked almost immediately because it does not fit one rejected episode or someone's headcanon. Instead of attacking it, we should be trying to help it fit in, even if the only explanation is "better production technology/standards" (a common theme in video game sequels). CBS has never waivered from their assertion that DISC is set in the Prime Universe, and that it will align more with TOS as the series progresses, a promise that was demonstrated quite well in the Season 2 trailer. As for it being a prequel, prequels are the best stories to write, as the writers have complete creative freedom - though DISC is constrained by the events of ENT. As we were been given virtually no information about the decade leading up to TOS, it is a blank slate for the writers to fill in. Let Discovery have its place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The examples you give are the Enterprise dealing with a foreign foe, Not internal struggles.
Your right they are the best episode of TOS and I love Romulans
TWoK is one of my faves, but it about th crewo fighting a foreign foe.... TVH, the crew fighting a foreign foe.... all as a team. First contact, Undiscovered country and so on. All the same, with very few internal fights and I see nothing wrong with that your right about Discovery being attack, but it's like they didn't even try.
Sorry got to go work, Hope to speak soon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In "The Balance of Terror," LT Stiles was at odds with Spock. In "Court Martial," Kirk was framed by Ben Finney, who felt wronged by Kirk. I personally like interpersonal conflict, especially among people one the same team. It makes a series feel more real. People don't always agree on things,even in the 23rd century, and those differences can lead to conflicts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>